2011
DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2011.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal Considerations in a Nuclear Detonation

Abstract: ABSTRACTThis article summarizes public health legal issues that need to be considered in preparing for and responding to nuclear detonation. Laws at the federal, state, territorial, local, tribal, and community levels can have a significant impact on the response to an emergency involving a nuclear detonation and the allocation of scarce resources for affected populations. An understanding of the breadth of these laws, the application of federal, state, and local law, and how e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 The ability of health care practitioners to cross state lines to provide care after disasters may become an issue when there is a medical surge due to this legal framework. 6,17 Various mechanisms are in place to address licensure portability issues. One such mechanism is deployment of Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMATs) under the federal National Disaster Medical System (NDMS).…”
Section: Licensure Portabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 The ability of health care practitioners to cross state lines to provide care after disasters may become an issue when there is a medical surge due to this legal framework. 6,17 Various mechanisms are in place to address licensure portability issues. One such mechanism is deployment of Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMATs) under the federal National Disaster Medical System (NDMS).…”
Section: Licensure Portabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, special effort should be made to train disaster mental health professionals in the unique legal and ethical intricacies that surround such services and circumstances (Gheytanchi et al, 2007;Sherman, 2011). Unfortunately, to date not much has been written to help mental health professionals understand the potential legal and ethical problems involved when responding to the acute aftermath of a disaster (Abdel-Monem & Bulling, 2005).…”
Section: Practical Legal and Ethical Considerations For The Provisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting articles in this special issue of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness are not intended to be exhaustive reviews, and they reflect the judgment and opinion of the experts, not those of the governmental agencies or academic institutions that employ them. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The recommendations are based on the available data, recognizing that the human and animal data on radiation injury alone and on combined injury are limited.…”
Section: Project Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting articles in this special issue of Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness are not intended to be exhaustive reviews, and they reflect the judgment and opinion of the experts, not those of the governmental agencies or academic institutions that employ them. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] The recommendations are based on the available data, recognizing that the human and animal data on radiation injury alone and on combined injury are limited.Model output for casualty types and number are described in a general manner. 15 (The Department of Health and Human Services has detailed models from which the data and guidance in these articles are based for the consequences of nuclear detonation in a range of cities, from a variety of heights of burst, and under a range of meteorological conditions, and for scarcity of specific resources for medical management of acute radiation syndrome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%