Legal informatics from the aspect of interoperability

Abstract

In the reality of globalization, the legislation of every country needs to be followed in order to achieve a well-organized globalization process because the rule of Law is a cornerstone, a fundamental foundation of every democratic state and it should be observed and respected by all in the society. The economic and industrial globalization has increased international competition and given rise to the need for an increasingly integrated and evolving legal system but the fundamental debates over globalization of the 1990s more or less petered out, without leading to a clear consensus. So, society is still overwhelmed with an over-load of legal information while in the era of Digital Transformation, technologies such as Big data, artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain, 3D promise to have a profoundly disruptive effect on the industry, business models, governance models and on the way we interact with each other in society. However, there is not a legal information system capable of supporting the legislation of all countries in order to facilitate the above operation but there are many initiatives in order to develop legal ontologies. These legal ontologies in combination with the disruptive technologies can be help the problem of fragmented legal information across-border in order to create the Big Linked Open Legal Data.

Grenzeloos toegang tot nationale wetgeving

“…100 mogelijk is, al moeten daarvoor aanvullende keuzes worden gemaakt. 111 De meeste juridische gebruikers van webportalen zullen overigens weinig 'last' hebben van standaarden zoals ELI of AKN. Terwijl de ECLI ook wordt gebruikt als voor mensen leesbare identificatiecode, zijn AKN en ELI vaak minder zichtbaar: ze worden ge bruikt als technische code in de hyperlink, waarvan het opschrift bestaat uit een voor juristen begrijpelijke bibliografische verwijzing.…”

Artificial Intelligence Application in Law: A Scientometric Review

“…The challenges of AI in a soft legal setting were explained methodically (Jordan, 2021). An evaluation of legal informatics systems, tools, and taxonomies was conducted based on compatibility (Loutsaris & Charalabidis, 2020). In 1979, a methodological examination of legal issues relating to computer networks was conducted (Steinmüller, 1979).…”

“…Subject areas, including legal informatics, legal information, technology law, and other similar names, have a long history with law and technology (Salami, 2017). Several recent studies investigated the use of AI in law (AIL), or AI, as a data mining tool in law enforcement for refining and driving evidence (Hoeschl & Barcellos, 2004;Jordan, 2021;Alzou'bi et al 2014;Loutsaris & Charalabidis, 2020;Petit, 2018;Salami, 2017). Despite this, few comprehensive high-level overviews of the field exist.…”

Untitled

“…Asimismo, el tema ha sido ventilado ampliamente en los medios globales desde los inicios de la pandemia de la COVID-19. Más allá de las acusaciones cruzadas sobre el origen del virus, el comienzo de la pandemia en Wuhan es incuestionable y los medios señalan que un residente de esa ciudad, de 55 años, pudo ser el primer infectado por el virus SARS-CoV-2 y que el 17 de noviembre de 2019 fue la fecha de la confirmación de la infección (Ma, 2020). Debieron transcurrir 95 días y producirse 118 mil contagios en 114 países para que, el 11 de marzo de 2020, la Organización Mundial de la Salud declarase la difusión de la nueva enfermedad como una pandemia (Organización Mundial de la Salud, 2020).…”