2010
DOI: 10.1093/jrs/feq039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal Status and Refugee Integration: a UK Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
42
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Such persons have maximum access to provisions and support. However, irrespective of the level of access to provisions, they face the same processes and systems which are unfamiliar and new to them (Da Lomba, 2010).…”
Section: Refugee Integration Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such persons have maximum access to provisions and support. However, irrespective of the level of access to provisions, they face the same processes and systems which are unfamiliar and new to them (Da Lomba, 2010).…”
Section: Refugee Integration Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current study moves beyond this dichotomy to an under-researched area: the integration experiences of refugees/asylum seekers in a group that is based on mutual accommodation. The integration of refugees/asylum seekers will inevitably be associated with specific barriers due to perceptions linked to one's legal status (Da Lomba 2010), which often reinforce their position on the periphery of the host society. This is especially relevant regarding UK refugee integration in light of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, which established the dispersal scheme, effectively removing new arrivals' ability to choose where they live (Refugee Council 2011).…”
Section: Refugee/asylum Seeker Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, negative perceptions and attitudes within the host society (Mestheneso and Ioannidi 2002) alongside political strategies of refugee/asylum seeker deterrence and exclusion (Phillips 2006) have created multiple barriers to integration. Furthermore, such negative perceptions are often intertwined with the very labels of refugee and asylum seeker, which carry significant legal connotations (Korac 2003;Da Lomba 2010) that are embedded in certain host society institutions. These perceptions tend to be manifested as "implicitly voiced negative opinions" (Blommaert and Verschueren 1998: 54), where the anti-immigrant sentiment is couched in an overall 'positive' statement; this results in a dangerous linguistic paradigm that subverts the integration efforts of refugees/asylum seekers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on refugee integration has focused upon both of these areas including how to facilitate full participation in the labour market (Bloch 2004), how to tackle obstacles to refugee integration (Mestheneos and Ioannidi 2002;Phillips 2006) and examination of community relations (Daley 2007). More recent work has critiqued legal and policy perspectives in relation to refugee integration (Da Lomba 2010;Mulvey 2010;Phillimore 2012). Drawing together the structural and acculturation strands of thought, Ager and Strang (2008) highlight what they see as the key integration domains for refugees and relate them to access and achievement within housing, employment, education and health.…”
Section: Refugee Integration and Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%