Research Handbook in Data Science and Law 2018
DOI: 10.4337/9781788111300.00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legal tech and blockchain for corporate governance and shareholders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facing this devastating picture, we focus on PICSDPDM-compliant solutions, such as encryption [32,35] or visualization [42] plugins for Learning Management Systems (LMS) or even ethics principles in educational data analytics [33]. From this point of view, the legal system is far from regulating every technological issue, as its growth rate is far greater than the legal evolution, as in the Blockchain's case, an example of technology already used but far away from compliance of regulations such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as shown by the work of Amo et al [33] and of Lafarre and Van der Elst [43]. Despite these differences, the legal system is working towards standardization.…”
Section: Data-related Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facing this devastating picture, we focus on PICSDPDM-compliant solutions, such as encryption [32,35] or visualization [42] plugins for Learning Management Systems (LMS) or even ethics principles in educational data analytics [33]. From this point of view, the legal system is far from regulating every technological issue, as its growth rate is far greater than the legal evolution, as in the Blockchain's case, an example of technology already used but far away from compliance of regulations such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), as shown by the work of Amo et al [33] and of Lafarre and Van der Elst [43]. Despite these differences, the legal system is working towards standardization.…”
Section: Data-related Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in the UK, intermediaries in the Central Securities Depository (CSD) are considered the legal owners of the securities and are treated as shareholders under section 112(2) of the UK Companies Act 2006meaning that beneficial owners depend on their intermediaries to pass their shareholder rights. Likewise, under Delaware Law in the US, registered holders are considered shareholders -meaning that beneficial owners depend on their intermediaries to obtain the proxy to vote their shares (Lafarre and Van der Elst, 2020 [11]; UNIDROIT, 2017 [12]).…”
Section: Figure 2 Voting Chain Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In France, Spain, Denmark, Sweden and Finland, for instance, intermediaries do not have any interest in the securities and the beneficial owner has legal, individual ownership over the securities located in the investor's securities account. Of note, investors that wish to hold shares anonymously can do so through a nominee (UNIDROIT, 2017 [12]; Lafarre and Van der Elst, 2020 [11]). As securities are traded cross-border, differences 2 To some extent, the use of standardised ISO 15022 format SWIFT messaging for the communication between the global custodians, sub-custodians and the voting service providers provides efficiencies and audit trails in parts of the voting chain (Norges Bank Investment Management, 2020 [10]).…”
Section: Figure 2 Voting Chain Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…May 11, 2016. See for another example Lafarre and Van der Elst (2018). 6 Re Appraisal of Dell Inc., Memorandum Opinion No.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%