2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legionella pneumophila sg1-sensing signal enhancement using a novel electrochemical immunosensor in dynamic detection mode

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Park, et al [ 10 ] have reported a DNA biosensor for the specific detection of L. pneumophila , but the extraction of DNA from bacteria is associated with a number of processing steps, resulting in laborious and costly analysis. Whole cell L. pneumophila biosensors have frequently been investigated based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [ 11 , 12 ], surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [ 13 ], and colorimetric detection [ 14 , 15 ], as presented in Table 1 . EIS biosensors have received significant attention due to their sensitivity and cost effectiveness [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Park, et al [ 10 ] have reported a DNA biosensor for the specific detection of L. pneumophila , but the extraction of DNA from bacteria is associated with a number of processing steps, resulting in laborious and costly analysis. Whole cell L. pneumophila biosensors have frequently been investigated based on electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) [ 11 , 12 ], surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [ 13 ], and colorimetric detection [ 14 , 15 ], as presented in Table 1 . EIS biosensors have received significant attention due to their sensitivity and cost effectiveness [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context, various types of L. pneumophila biosensors have been investigated ranging from optical , and piezoelectric , to electrochemical. , However, to the best of our knowledge, an economically attractive method for automated monitoring of water reservoirs for the presence of pathogenic bacteria has yet to be developed. Recently, photoluminescence (PL)-based detection of E.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(21-mer DNA sequence) Differential pulse voltammetry Approx 45 min (PCR NOT INCLUDED) YES Asymmetric PCR mismatched DNA 3.1 × 10 −13 M of synthetic DNA coding for 21-mer gene [ 30 ] Electrochemical genosensor based on amplified molecular beacon for the detection of Legionella spp. (21-mer DNA sequence) using thiolated hairpin DNA-ferrocene probes on gold electrodes Differential pulse voltammetry 45 min approx (PCR NOT INCLUDED) YES PCR Mismatched DNA 2.3 × 10 −14 M of synthetic DNA coding for 21-mer gene [ 31 ] Microfluidic electrochemical genosensor for the detection of target sequence ( L. pneumophila ) based on two-step sandwich with strep-coated paramagnetic microparticles, a biotinylated capture probe and strep-AP (streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate) Amperometry 16 min (PCR NOT INCLUDED) NO Mismatched DNA 0.33 nM of synthetic DNA [ 32 ] Electrochemical genosensor for the detection of the target sequence ( mip gene sequence) of L. pneumophila based on a multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) electrode Differential pulse voltammetry 40 min (PCR NOT INCLUDED) NO Mismatched DNA 10 pM of synthetic DNA coding for mip gene [ 33 ] Electrochemical immunosensor for the detection of L. pneumophila developing an immunoassay in nitrocellulose filters Amperometry 2–3 h YES Filtration of 200 mL (The antibody used in this paper was previously tested in another work) 4 CFU mL −1 [ 34 ] Electrochemical immunosensor based on a microfluidic assay in water samples for the detection of L. pneumophila Square wave voltammetry 100–180 min (depending on the detection mode, dynamic or static) NO NO 10 CFU mL −1 [ 20 ] Electrochemical magneto immunosensor for the detection of L. pneumophila based on disposable core-shell Fe 3 O 4 @poly(dopamine) magnetic nanoparticles and a sandwich enzyme-linked i...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%