2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0008423918000203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legislative Party Switching and the Changing Nature of the Canadian Party System, 1867–2015

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the phenomenon of party switchers in the Canadian House of Commons. With the most extensive dataset on party-switching MPs (1867–2015), we answer the following questions: What are the electoral trajectories of party switchers? Have their prospects changed over time? We assess whether the historical dynamics of the Canadian party system explain changes in the incidence and fate of party switchers since 1867, hypothesizing that both the rate of party switching and the electoral fort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, once we account for the factors in the model, party switchers are not significantly more electorally vulnerable than non-switchers according to a common measure of marginality. This allows us to rule out endogeneity as an alternative explanation for our finding that party switchers pay an electoral price, and it is consistent with prior research conducted at the congressional level (Yoshinaka 2016) and elsewhere (Sevi, Yoshinaka, and Blais 2018). 14…”
Section: Empirical Analyses Of Ambition and Party Switchingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Rather, once we account for the factors in the model, party switchers are not significantly more electorally vulnerable than non-switchers according to a common measure of marginality. This allows us to rule out endogeneity as an alternative explanation for our finding that party switchers pay an electoral price, and it is consistent with prior research conducted at the congressional level (Yoshinaka 2016) and elsewhere (Sevi, Yoshinaka, and Blais 2018). 14…”
Section: Empirical Analyses Of Ambition and Party Switchingsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…So far, these data have been used for five peer-reviewed manuscripts (Sevi, Yoshinaka and Blais, 2018; Sevi, Arel-Bundock and Blais, 2018; Sevi, Blais and Mayer, 2020; Tolley, Besco and Sevi, 2020; Sevi, Blais and Arel-Bundock, 2021); they have also been used in a number of presentations at academic conferences, in reports by think tanks, 7 by journalists, 8 and in many papers currently online or in the pipeline. As such, these data have been scrutinized by different researchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data will allow researchers to investigate a number of important topics, including: the share of female candidates over an extended period of time; which occupations do better in politics (Sevi, Blais and Mayer, 2020); if women get fewer votes than men (Sevi, Arel-Bundock and Blais, 2018; Sevi, Blais and Arel-Bundock, 2021); how long politicians tend to stay in politics; the advantage gained by incumbency; how well independents do; the consequences for politicians who are elected under a party banner and then switch their party affiliation and run again either at the same level of government (Sevi, Yoshinaka and Blais, 2018) or across two different levels (provincial and federal); the progressive ambition of politicians across different levels of elections; and if by-elections are more favourable to smaller parties and/or independent candidates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-financial data were assembled from several online sources. Data for incumbency were collected from the Pundits' Guide to Canadian Elections (Funke, 2015), and their reliability was verified by comparing them to Sevi and colleagues’ (2018, 2019) candidate dataset 6 . Similarly, data for members of cabinet immediately before the election campaign were gathered from the Parliament of Canada website (Canada, Parliament, 2019) and media reports (CBC News, 2007, 2008, 2011).…”
Section: Hypotheses and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%