2019 18th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icmla.2019.00129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legislative Vote Prediction using Campaign Donations and Fuzzy Hierarchical Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous techniques to assess political relationships within voting organizations based on the compilation of statistics from votes by members. Methods range from clustering techniques [1][2][3] and network analyses [3][4][5], to multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) [6][7][8] and dimensionality reduction [9][10][11][12]. These approaches seek to highlight, or define, where people or groups of people are most similar and most divergent in their political behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are numerous techniques to assess political relationships within voting organizations based on the compilation of statistics from votes by members. Methods range from clustering techniques [1][2][3] and network analyses [3][4][5], to multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) [6][7][8] and dimensionality reduction [9][10][11][12]. These approaches seek to highlight, or define, where people or groups of people are most similar and most divergent in their political behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches seek to highlight, or define, where people or groups of people are most similar and most divergent in their political behaviors. Applications include analysis and interpretation of historical voting data [4,[13][14][15], identification of voting coalitions among individuals [16][17][18][19], and prediction of future voting patterns [2,20]. Within one visualization it can be difficult to encompass or present a view of interesting or unique relationships of individuals relative to some larger group, each other, and other sub-groups, and interpretable quantitative information on the strength or proximity of these relationships is absent in the output from many methods [4,9,19,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%