Legitimacy and reputation in the institutional field of food safety: A public relations case study

Abstract

The overall objective of this study is to examine how the institutional context of food safety affects and is affected by concerns for legitimacy and reputation. The paper employs a neo-institutional approach to analyzing the institutional field of food safety in a case study of a multinational food service provider where a tension between conflicting institutional logics implied a reputational challenge. The study shows how food safety as a well-defined operational risk is transformed into a high-priority reputational risk and how actors in the field of food safety are caught in a state of mutual distrust, partly as a consequence of an intense politicization of food risk over the past years and partly as a result of their respective concerns for legitimacy. The study points to how the field of food safety is colonized by a reputational logic that is paradoxically reproduced by actors at all organizational levels even though they strongly oppose to this logic.

The role of public relations in corporate diplomacy: how relationship cultivation increases organizational legitimacy

“…Previously, organizational legitimacy has been discussed across several research fields, particularly organization studies, and increasingly in the realm of public relations (Merkelsen, 2013;Veil & Anthony, 2017;Wakefield et al, 2013). Organizational legitimacy has often been referred to as the perception of a group concerning the appropriateness and desirability of organizational behavior (Suchman, 1995).…”

Corporate diplomacy and political CSR: Similarities, differences and theoretical implications

“…While PR research was for a long time dominated by a functionalist-managerial paradigm, a few scholars called for the embedding of PR in its social and political context (e.g., Ihlen, Fredriksson, & van Ruler, 2009;Sandhu, 2009;Tsetsura, 2010). As organizational legitimacy is crucial for an organization's survival, we follow the argument that legitimacy is a core function of PR, particularly evident in reflective PR (Hoffjann, 2011;Holmström, 2010;van Ruler & Vercic, 2005) and neo-institutional PR (Frandsen & Johansen, 2013;Fredriksson, Pallas, & Wehmeiher, 2013;Merkelsen, 2013;Sandhu, 2009). Van Ruler and Vercic (2005, p. 253) argue that reflective PR is a "strategic process of viewing an organization from the outside, or public view".…”

Communicating legitimacy through portrayals of successful aging: An examination of Pulte homes’ online communication strategies

“…The act of establishing legitimacy, or communicating alignment with ‘regulatory, normative and cultural-cognitive conditions and expectations in the organizational environment’ (Merkelsen, 2013: 244), is imperative to public relations scholarship and practice (Heath, 2009; Merkelsen, 2013; Metzler, 2001) especially in terms of organizational–stakeholder relationship management (Waymer and Heath, 2014). In this way, establishing legitimacy is a public relations function as it relies on the co-management and perceived alignment of interests between an organization and its stakeholders and/or publics.…”