2005
DOI: 10.1080/03071020500304627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Legitimacy’ and social boundaries: free people of colour and the social order in Jamaican slave society1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This form of concubinage was widely accepted and seen as a crucial part of colonial life. 58 The relationship and the cohabitation were often terminated when the white man married. 59 Adrian's wife, Magdalen Astor, the daughter of the American millionaire Jacob Astor, moved in with him in 1807 and Henriette subsequently had to move out.…”
Section: Henriette Fransisca Coppy (1781-1858)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This form of concubinage was widely accepted and seen as a crucial part of colonial life. 58 The relationship and the cohabitation were often terminated when the white man married. 59 Adrian's wife, Magdalen Astor, the daughter of the American millionaire Jacob Astor, moved in with him in 1807 and Henriette subsequently had to move out.…”
Section: Henriette Fransisca Coppy (1781-1858)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 Since it was accepted for white men to live with free colored, but not accepted to formally marry them, it is likely that Henriette officially had to be registered on another address than Adrian while living with him. 63 In 1816, Adrian was promoted to general governor and it was decided that it was better for his status and esteem if he brought his wife back from New York to live with him instead of living with his free colored mistress. Adrian Benzton's good friend Hans Dahlerup, who lived a couple of years in Adrian's house in Christiansted, describes in his memoirs how Magdalen was sent for and Henriette again had to move out.…”
Section: Henriette Fransisca Coppy (1781-1858)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown already, although free and potentially propertied, these people had no rights to representation in the assembly or to government office. Indeed, their freedoms were increasingly restricted across the 18th‐century (Petley 2005). A 1717 act required those without sufficient property to carry a certificate signed by a JP and to wear a blue cross on their shoulder, so that it might be known who was enslaved and who free 39 .…”
Section: Giving Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As soon as there was public legislation enacting categorical distinctions based on ‘race’, then there were private acts shifting individuals between those categories and reallocating rights. There was the manumission of slaves, often in slave‐owners’ wills (Petley 2005). There was the declaration, in order to prevent the kidnapping of Indians from central America, ‘that all Indians brought to the island since 28 th December 1741 be declared to be Free People’ 46 .…”
Section: Giving Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burnard 1991;Josephs 2015; Livesay 2018:20-232;Pearsall 2003;Petley 2005;Sturtz 1999; Walker 2020. 8 For earlier funds in Britain and North America, see below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%