Legitimasi Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis legitimasi hak angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia, dengan fokus permasalahan pada hak angket terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa legitimasi hak angket DPR RI terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi tidak hanya berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017, namun harus memenuhi unsur-unsur sebagaimana Pasal 79 ayat (3), Pasal 199, dan Pasal 201 Ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014. Rekomendasi dari penelitian ini yakni perlunya berbagai upaya penguatan terhadap eksistensi KPK sebagai lembaga yang independen, serta bebas dari pengaruh kekuasaan manapun, mengingat keberadaan KPK sangat penting bagi Negara Indonesia dengan tingkat korupsi yang masih tinggi.

The Nature of the Authority of the Honorary Court of the House of Representatives in Increasing the Respect and Degree of the Council of People's Representatives

“…MKD is a moral guard so that people's representatives think and act in accordance with the council's code of ethics that has been set. 2) unable to carry out duties on an ongoing basis or permanently absent as a Member for 3 (three) consecutive months without valid information ; 3) no longer fulfills the requirements as a Member as stipulated in the provisions regarding the requirements for candidate Members stipulated in the law regarding the general election of Members of the People's Representative Council, Regional Representative Council, and Regional People's Representative Council; and/or 4) violates the provisions of the prohibition as stipulated in the law governing the People's Consultative Assembly, the People's Representative Council, the Regional Representative Council, and the Regional People's Representative Council c. convene a hearing to accept the actions and/or events that should be suspected of being committed by a Member as a violation of the (2) . The Ethics Council at that time had the function of receiving, examining and reporting the results of the examination to the Leadership of the DPR RI and submitted to the President to be inaugurated on the basis of alleged violations of the code of ethics committed by the Leaders of the DPR RI, alleged violations of oaths/pledges, the DPR RI code of ethics and/or does not carry out his obligations as a member of the DPR RI as a result of complaints from the leadership of the DPR RI, the public and/or voters.…”

“…1 The position of the DPR in the system of administering state power underwent significant changes since the fourth amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) was enacted. 2 Based on the first amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the presence of the People's Representative Council (DPR) is also in Article 20, which was adopted in the text of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia where the DPR is a people's representative institution that has legislative functions, budgetary functions and supervisory functions. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia clearly illustrates that in the framework of the legislative and oversight functions, the main institution is the DPR.…”

Untitled

“…Menteri Kehakiman Apabila setelah pemeriksaan pendahuluan terdapat bukti yang cukup meyakinkan untuk mendukung penuntutan terhadap tersangka korupsi atau pelaku korupsi lainnya. 19 KPK berhak membawa perkara tersebut ke pengadilan. Tujuan dari penuntutan ini adalah untu untuk memastikan bahwa mereka yang bersalah melakukan korupsi diadili dan menerima hukuman yang pantas mereka terima.…”