Legitimate and illegitimate consumer complaining behavior: a review and taxonomy

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to provide an integrative view of the conceptualizations, definitions, antecedents and taxonomies of consumer complaining behavior (CCB). Additionally, the study aims to provide an updated synthesis and classification of both legitimate and illegitimate CCB antecedents, as well as an integrated CCB taxonomy. Design/methodology/approach A multi-stage systematic search is conducted and 226 research articles relevant to the scope of the study are analyzed to fulfill the study’s objectives. Findings Through an exhaustive aggregation, legitimate and illegitimate CCB antecedents identified in the literature are collated and a classification schema is developed. Deficiencies observed in extant CCB taxonomies are addressed and a refined taxonomy incorporating illegitimate CCB is developed. Research limitations/implications The conclusions drawn on the basis of this paper are contingent on the effectiveness of the keyword-based systematic search process that is used to demarcate the extant literature. Practical implications This paper suggests a three-pronged approach of differential enabling, legitimacy evaluation and differential management. This holistic perspective aims at enabling firms to design complaint management policies and systems that control fake complaints while maintaining sufficient redress opportunities for genuine dissatisfaction. Originality/value The paper proposes an identical classification schema for legitimate and illegitimate CCB antecedents and is the first broad-based attempt to develop an integrated CCB taxonomy.

Shared consumption and its determinants: A systematic literature review and future research agenda

“…This assessment further eliminated 253 articles reducing the set to 318 eligible articles. Additional 13 studies traced through the ancestry approach (Arora & Chakraborty, 2020) were included to arrive at the final set of 331 articles (Table S2).…”

Forms of falsified online reviews: the good, the bad, and the downright ugly

“…Most of the research in this area assumes that these conversations are always truthful, with consumers sharing their real experiences; however, studies show that exaggerated WOM is common (Harris et al , 2016). Consumers lying and exaggerating their complaints and WOM, both negatively and positively, is pervasive and was widespread even before the advent of social media (Harris et al , 2016; Arora and Chakraborty, 2020; Snyder et al , 2022) but social media have made these comments accessible by a greater audience (Istanbulluoglu et al , 2017).…”

Complaint management: comparison between traditional and digital banks and the benefits of using management systems for improvement

“…In dealing with customer satisfaction, banks have been demanded to provide increasingly accessible means for customers to solve their problems (Komulainen and Saraniemi, 2019), as well as showing courtesy and an everincreasing level of service (Sampson and Money, 2015). Accordingly, complaint management, understood as strategies firms use to resolve and learn from service failures in order to (re) establish the organization's reliability in the eyes of the customer (Hart et al, 1990), including both proactive and reactive organizational responses (Arora and Chakraborty, 2020), has proven to be a strategic factor in the competitiveness of banks (Morgeson et al, 2020).…”