Legitimating Reflective Writing in SoTL: “Dysfunctional Illusions of Rigor” Revisited

Abstract

In a classic 2010 article, Craig Nelson critiques his own previously held “Dysfunctional Illusions of Rigor” that for years had constrained his teaching. He demonstrates that certain “rigorous” pedagogical practices disadvantage rather than support learners, and he argues for an expansion of what counts as legitimate pedagogical approaches. We evoke Nelson’s assertions to make a parallel argument regarding the traditional conventions of academic discourse. While formal scholarly writing may be well suited to capturing some of the outcomes of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL), these genres can also be exclusive; inadequate to the task of conveying the complex, incomplete, and messy aspects of the work; and neither interesting nor accessible to those who are not required to produce or to read SoTL publications. We propose that reflective writing be legitimated as a form of writing for SoTL, and we use examples from a growing body of reflective writing about pedagogical partnership to illustrate our points. Echoing Nelson, our four reasons for this expansion of legitimacy are: (1) the process of reflection is an essential component of learning; (2) reflective writing captures the complexity of learning; (3) reflection is an accessible form of writing for both new and experienced SoTL authors; and (4) reflective writing is accessible to a wide range of readers. We conclude by emphasizing the potential of including reflective writing among those modes of analysis valued in SoTL to expand what counts as rigor in the construction and representation of knowledge about teaching and learning.

Writing Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Articles for Peer-Reviewed Journals

“…Reflective essays invite authors to share the messy, unfinished, personal work of SoTL-the lived experience and the sense people make of it that rarely find a place in other forms of scholarship. Writing a reflective essay therefore requires a mindset and style that differ from both empirical research and conceptual articles (Cook-Sather, Abbot, & Felten, 2019): willingness to share in-process experiences and insights, write in the first person, and present learnings rather than empirical findings or arguments.…”

A Murder Mystery Gamification Session to Consolidate Analytical Biochemical Techniques Learning

“…Some of these suggestions would make the session inaccessible to nonbiochemists (e.g., forensic science students): consequently, we have separated the code into two streams for biochemists and others. We intend to ask a student to assist us with changes for future implementation to provide a student perspective before the session …”

The Courage to SoTL

“…At the beginning of this process, we knew that an article would be written but we could not have predicted the insights we would glean from the process. Our work contributes to SoTL literature that interrogates spaces of power, positionality, and intersectionality (Chick 2014;Kehler, Verwoord, and Smith 2017;Little, Green, and Felten 2019;Matthews 2017). Through our conversations about living an undivided life we challenge the use of binaries that do not capture the fluidity of identity.…”