2006
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2006.22798178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Legitimizing a New Role: Small Wins and Microprocesses of Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
350
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 386 publications
(365 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
11
350
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, 9 of 20 studies in this grouping were deemed as medium readiness (i.e., clear implications for implementation), while the remaining 11 studies had low intervention readiness (i.e., indirect implications). The dependent variables of interest included organizational change (e.g., dutton and Ashford 1993; Reay et al 2006), innovation (e.g., ferlie et al 2005; West et al 2006) and team learning (e.g., Edmondson 2003).…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, 9 of 20 studies in this grouping were deemed as medium readiness (i.e., clear implications for implementation), while the remaining 11 studies had low intervention readiness (i.e., indirect implications). The dependent variables of interest included organizational change (e.g., dutton and Ashford 1993; Reay et al 2006), innovation (e.g., ferlie et al 2005; West et al 2006) and team learning (e.g., Edmondson 2003).…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These "embedded" representatives were able to influence practice and effect change in the pilot site by using their existing relationships and local knowledge to engage pilot site staff (Reay et al 2006). Pilot site staff were in the best position to identify both problems and solutions and were often keen to be part of the project.…”
Section: Change Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs because new allies bring new solutions with them and old opponents change their habits. Additional resources also flow toward winners, which means that slightly larger wins can be attempted‖ (Weick, 1984: 43; see also Plowman et al, 2007;Reay, Golden-Biddle, & Germann, 2006). In other words, iteration, repetition, and continuous learning help maintain engagement and pursue additional experimentation (Dietz et al, 2003;Simon, 1996).…”
Section: Distributed Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%