1884
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1209365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lehrbuch der Klinischen Untersuchungs-Methoden für die Brust- und Unterleibsorgane mit Einschluss der Laryngoskopie

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Notwithstanding the ongoing controversies about the correctness of the specific acoustical explanations he had given, Skoda's revised sign systems became part and parcel of the German physician's diagnostic competence. It was his taxonomy that was to be found in the German textbooks (Guttmann 1904;Müller-Seifert 1929), and albeit acknowledging the contribution of Laennec, it was he who was ritually credited as the real founder of modern physical diagnosis. In France, however, Skoda remained almost completely neglected: neither in the practice of auscultation nor in the way its history was told did a comparable transformation take place.…”
Section: The Rise Of the Viennese Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Notwithstanding the ongoing controversies about the correctness of the specific acoustical explanations he had given, Skoda's revised sign systems became part and parcel of the German physician's diagnostic competence. It was his taxonomy that was to be found in the German textbooks (Guttmann 1904;Müller-Seifert 1929), and albeit acknowledging the contribution of Laennec, it was he who was ritually credited as the real founder of modern physical diagnosis. In France, however, Skoda remained almost completely neglected: neither in the practice of auscultation nor in the way its history was told did a comparable transformation take place.…”
Section: The Rise Of the Viennese Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He likened the rhythm to " ffou-tata-rofu" and thought that the reduplication of the second sound, described originally by Bouillaud (1835), might be due to asynchronous closure of the aortic and pulmonary valves. But it was Guttmann (1872), and later Sansom (1881), who first attributed the origin of the sound to vibration of the mitral valve. Then in 1888, Rouches used the term "claquement d'ouverte de la mitrale".…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Παρωμοίασε τήν άκροαστικήν εικόνα προς τον ρυθμον FFOUT-TA-TA-ROU καί εσκέφθη, δτι δ διχασμός του δευ τέρου τόνου, δ περιγραφείς υπό του Bouillaud το 1835^, δυνατόν να οφείλεται εις τήν άσύγχρονον σύγκλεισιν της αορτικής καί της πνευμονικής βαλφΐδος. "Ο μως δ Gutmann τό J872 4 καί κατόπιν ό Sansoni το 1881 5 ήσαν οι πρώτοι, οί όποιοι απέδωσαν τον διχασμόν του δευτέρου τόνου επί στενώσεως της μιτρο ειδούς εις τήν δόνησιν τής μιτροειδούς βαλβΐδος. Κατόπιν ό Rouchés 6 εχρησιμοποίησε τον δρον κλαγγή διανοίξεως της μιτροειδούς (Claquement cf Ouver ture de la Mitrale).…”
unclassified