2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100969
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leisure-time physical activity is associated with socio-economic status beyond income – Cross-sectional survey of the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results remained stable regardless of the measurement type of physical activity. According to previous literature, higher education has been shown to be related to higher physical activity (30,31). Similarly, higher physical activity has been shown to be related to higher incomes (32–35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results remained stable regardless of the measurement type of physical activity. According to previous literature, higher education has been shown to be related to higher physical activity (30,31). Similarly, higher physical activity has been shown to be related to higher incomes (32–35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLOTH model, developed by Cawley in 2004, considers the allocation of time to various activities. This model assumes that individuals choose how to spend their time according to utility and cost [64,65]. Thus, the decision to spend time on passive entertainment activities is related to a lower level of education and this could be reflected in children's behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower education and income levels have already been shown to be associated with lower involvement in PA in both males and females of all ages, and that an inverse relationship exists between social economic status and sedentary time, compounding the concern in our set up. Individuals in the lower socio economic strata have more sitting and screen-time compared to those of the higher socio economic statuses [24][25][26][27][28]. Local data is minimal however, and this paucity of data from lower socio-economic countries contribute the current recommendation of need for more work to adequately demonstrate how socioeconomic status impacts PA involvement [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%