2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfi.2005.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lending relationships in line-of-credit and nonline-of-credit loans: Evidence from collateral use in small business

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
110
2
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
110
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Lenders may gather proprietary information about the borrower's project choice, effort, and risk as their relationship with the borrower strengthens (e.g., Petersen and Rajan 1994, Berger and Udell 1995, Degryse and van Cayseele 2000. The empirical association between collateral and relationship strength is sometimes found to be negative as predicted by the private-information models (e.g., Berger and Udell 1995, Harhoff andKorting 1998, Chakraborty andHu 2006) -precisely those borrowers that pledge collateral in models based on moral hazard and other ex post frictions. Second, the results could be biased toward a negative association to the extent tha t collateral and relationships are substitute methods of dealing with opacity problems.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lenders may gather proprietary information about the borrower's project choice, effort, and risk as their relationship with the borrower strengthens (e.g., Petersen and Rajan 1994, Berger and Udell 1995, Degryse and van Cayseele 2000. The empirical association between collateral and relationship strength is sometimes found to be negative as predicted by the private-information models (e.g., Berger and Udell 1995, Harhoff andKorting 1998, Chakraborty andHu 2006) -precisely those borrowers that pledge collateral in models based on moral hazard and other ex post frictions. Second, the results could be biased toward a negative association to the extent tha t collateral and relationships are substitute methods of dealing with opacity problems.…”
Section: Empirical Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brick and Palia (2007) show that the probability of firm collateral requirement decreases with the length of bank-firm relationship. Similarly, Chakraborty and Hu (2006) find that the incidence of collateral pledge decreases with the number of lender-provided financial services used by the borrower. By contrast, other studies (Machauer and Weber 1998, Degryse and Van Cayseele 2000, Elsas and Krahnen 2002, Lehmann and Neuberger 2001, and Menkhoff et al 2006, Ono and Uesugi 2009) find that collateral is contract-term prevalent into the relationship between the borrowers and their main bank.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Boot and Thakor (1994) reported similar results and explained that a longer term bank-borrower relationship enables the banks to efficiently evaluate the borrower over time and reduces the use of collateral. Chakraborty and Hu (2006) also found a negative relationship between the firm's age and the incidence of collateral. The authors explained that since older firms have longer track records and less information problems than younger firms, they are less likely to pledge collateral.…”
Section: Collateralmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Chakraborty and Hu (2006) also suggested that collateralization could reduce informational asymmetry and moral hazard problems. In addition, the authors also reported the need for collateral to decrease as the duration of the bank-borrower relationship increases.…”
Section: Collateralmentioning
confidence: 99%