2019
DOI: 10.1080/16583655.2019.1703248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length and curvature variation energy minimizing planar cubic G1 Hermite interpolation curve

Abstract: In this paper, we study how to construct a planar cubic G 1 Hermite interpolation curve with minimal length and curvature variation energy. This problem is solved by a bi-objective optimization model. We prove that there is a unique solution to this problem and give the expression of the solution. Some numerical examples show that the proposed method makes the curvature variation energy of the curve as small as possible when the length of the curve as short as possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, shape optimization of parametric curves has attracted more and more attention in recent years, and various objective functions have been proposed to optimize the shape of parametric curves. The internal energy of curves is a widely used objective function, which usually includes stretch energy, strain energy (also called bending energy), and curvature variation energy (often replaced by Jerk's energy), see [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The external energy of curves is another common objective functional for optimizing the shape of curves, see [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, shape optimization of parametric curves has attracted more and more attention in recent years, and various objective functions have been proposed to optimize the shape of parametric curves. The internal energy of curves is a widely used objective function, which usually includes stretch energy, strain energy (also called bending energy), and curvature variation energy (often replaced by Jerk's energy), see [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The external energy of curves is another common objective functional for optimizing the shape of curves, see [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various objective functions have been proposed to optimize the shape of parametric curves, among which the internal energy of curves is a widely used objective function. Generally, the internal energy of curves includes stretch energy, strain energy (also called bending energy), and curvature variation energy (often replaced by Jerk's energy), see [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. This paper's second purpose is to optimize the shape of the new Hermite interpolation curve by minimizing the internal energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For constructing the smooth planar cubic Hermite curve, many researchers used the energy minimizations to select the two free parameters of the planar cubic Hermite curve. Among these methods, the strain energy minimization and curvature variation energy minimization are two commonly used methods (see Jaklič and Žagar, 2011a;Jaklič and Žagar, 2011b;Li and Zhang, 2020b;Li et al, 2012;Lu, 2015a;Lu et al, 2017c;Yong and Cheng, 2004). It may not be possible to evaluate which of the energy minimizations is better for constructing the smooth planar cubic Hermite curve, since there is no recognized way to describe the smoothness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%