1988
DOI: 10.1080/02673843.1988.9747642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length of Stay and Age affect Recidivism after a Quality Treatment Program

Abstract: This study investigated the impact of the factors of age and length of stay on recidivism for two hundred and twenty-eight male juvenile offenders. These boys, who were between the ages of 12 and 18, were residents at Elk Hill Farm in Goochland, Virginia. Elk Hill Farm is a private, non-profit, institution for troubled youth which utilizes a quality, multi-faceted treatment program that includes the following components; a peer group model, an aftercare program, a special education school, wilderness therapy a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That younger age at entry into juvenile justice systems is a risk factor has been noted for some time in the delinquency literature (Ganzer & Sarason, 1973;Lueger & Cadman, 1982;Traynelis-Yurek & Giacobbe, 1988), however the implications of this finding are unclear. It may suggest that younger offenders simply have a greater window of opportunity to reoffend because of their age, are identified by police earlier and thus are under surveillance for more time, or it may point to more serious pathology indicated by younger offending (e.g., Moffitt, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…That younger age at entry into juvenile justice systems is a risk factor has been noted for some time in the delinquency literature (Ganzer & Sarason, 1973;Lueger & Cadman, 1982;Traynelis-Yurek & Giacobbe, 1988), however the implications of this finding are unclear. It may suggest that younger offenders simply have a greater window of opportunity to reoffend because of their age, are identified by police earlier and thus are under surveillance for more time, or it may point to more serious pathology indicated by younger offending (e.g., Moffitt, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%