2018
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight and length-length relationships for three species of Squalius (Cyprinidae; Leuciscinae) from the Caspian Sea, Namak and Tigris basins of Iran

Abstract: Length‐weight and length‐length relationships were estimated for three species of the genus Squalius. These fish were sampled from the Caspian Sea as well as the Namak and Tigris basins of Iran. Sampling took place between July 2009 and August 2010 using a seine net (15 m long, 2 m width and 5 mm mesh size). The values of the b parameter in the length‐weight relationship equations were determined as 3.37 for S. turcicus, 3.25 for S. namak and 3.14 for S. berak (b > 3).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of relationship between length and weight (LWRs) provides information about the growth of fish, their general health and the health of their habitats (Jisr et al, 2018;Morato et al, 2001;Mouludi-Saleh and Keivany, 2018). These studies provide valuable information about the growth pattern, general health status, habitat conditions, life history, obesity degree and quality of fish, as well as their morphological characteristics (Schneider et al, 2000;Froese, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of relationship between length and weight (LWRs) provides information about the growth of fish, their general health and the health of their habitats (Jisr et al, 2018;Morato et al, 2001;Mouludi-Saleh and Keivany, 2018). These studies provide valuable information about the growth pattern, general health status, habitat conditions, life history, obesity degree and quality of fish, as well as their morphological characteristics (Schneider et al, 2000;Froese, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%