2018
DOI: 10.1111/jai.13796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length-weight and length-length relationships of 15 algae scraper fishes of the genusCapoeta(Cyprinidae) in Iran

Abstract: Length-weight and length-length parameters are presented for 15 algae scraper fishes species of the genus Capoeta from Iran. Fish specimens were collected using an electrofishing device (ELEMAX, SHX 2000) and hand-nets (mesh size 5 × 5 mm) in distinctly basins or river drainages of Iran at depths of approximately 0.2-1.2 m during 2005-2017. Significant length-weight and length-length relationships with high correlation coefficients (>0.95) were found for all species except two. How to cite this article: Zareia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scales of all the nine studied Garra species demonstrated a specific sectioned form, that is, “tetra‐sectioned” type, due to the presence of radii in all four fields of scales (anterior, posterior, and laterals). The “tetra‐sectioned” type has also been reported for the scales of G. shamal (Al Jufaili et al, 2022), G. sharq (Echreshavi, Al Jufaili, et al, 2022), G. rossica (Esmaeili et al, 2012), and G. rufa , G. persica , and G. hormuzensis (Zareian et al, 2021). In addition to these typical characteristics, some morphological variations in the scales of the examined fishes were observed in the overall shape and the focus shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Scales of all the nine studied Garra species demonstrated a specific sectioned form, that is, “tetra‐sectioned” type, due to the presence of radii in all four fields of scales (anterior, posterior, and laterals). The “tetra‐sectioned” type has also been reported for the scales of G. shamal (Al Jufaili et al, 2022), G. sharq (Echreshavi, Al Jufaili, et al, 2022), G. rossica (Esmaeili et al, 2012), and G. rufa , G. persica , and G. hormuzensis (Zareian et al, 2021). In addition to these typical characteristics, some morphological variations in the scales of the examined fishes were observed in the overall shape and the focus shape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%