2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length–weight relationship of 39 selected reef fishes in the Kenyan coastal artisanal fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wambiji et al (2008) and also Agembe et al (2010) report higher condition factor of 0.9 to 1.2 for Siganids captured using basket trap and other gears, in the south coast of Kenya. On the other hand, Mbaru et al (2010) report condition factors of 0.01 to 0.4 for L. lentjan and L. fulviflamma caught using nets, which are lower than values reported here. Nandikeswan and Ananda (2013) report GSI of over 4.0 in Terapon puta from Asia, which is higher than levels reported here.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wambiji et al (2008) and also Agembe et al (2010) report higher condition factor of 0.9 to 1.2 for Siganids captured using basket trap and other gears, in the south coast of Kenya. On the other hand, Mbaru et al (2010) report condition factors of 0.01 to 0.4 for L. lentjan and L. fulviflamma caught using nets, which are lower than values reported here. Nandikeswan and Ananda (2013) report GSI of over 4.0 in Terapon puta from Asia, which is higher than levels reported here.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Fish condition and GSI have been shown to vary with season, diet and fish shape (Nash et al, 2006). Condition factor of 0.2 to 1.2 have been recorded with values close to or above unity, representing fish with superior condition (Agembe et al, 2010;Al-Zibdah and Kan'an, 2009;Mbaru et al, 2010). Depending on fish species and sex, GSI cutoff of between 1 to 10% have been suggested to indicate mature adults (Al-Zibdad and Kan'an, 2009; Kreiner et al, 2001;Zeyl et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lutjanidae family have both positive and negative allometric development [48] [49]. Mbaru et al [48], Gómez et al [50] and Manickchand-Heileman & Phillip [51] reported almost isometric growth in L. bohar, L. vivanus, and L. purpureus respectively.…”
Section: Shape Variation and Developmental Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lutjanidae family have both positive and negative allometric development [48] [49]. Mbaru et al [48], Gómez et al [50] and Manickchand-Heileman & Phillip [51] reported almost isometric growth in L. bohar, L. vivanus, and L. purpureus respectively. In its early larval stage, L. campechanus (Poey, 1860) has an allometric growth pattern, regarding to length of trunk on the standard [54].…”
Section: Shape Variation and Developmental Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intra and inter-species difference was reported in the coefficient of condition due to the individual biology of the fish viz., gonad maturation process in male and female, body size, accumulation of lipid and muscle growth (Barnharm and Baxte, 1998), environmental conditions of the habitat such as different salinity regime (Nehemia et al, 2012) and different length class that had been sampled during the study period (Mbaru et al, 2011;Shukor et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%