“…The present study showed that 'b' values of 3.1215-3.1819 may be considered within the expected range of fishes (Froese, 2006;Sivadas, Sureshkumar, & Kannan, 2020) as different variables including sampling preference such as different fishing gears and mesh size, geographic area, seasons, feeding habits, population, gonad condition, parasitic infection, physiological factors and environmental parameter may affect the outcome of the study (Moutopoulos & Stergiou, 2002). The lower r 2 values in this study might be due to following limitation (a) measurements were made very restricted to narrow size range of these species, where the smaller size classes were missing (b) observation of similar body form during different seasons (Gupta, Sarkar, Bhardwaj, & Pal, 2011) (c) over-representation of the certain size range (Kodeeswaran et al, 2020) and (d) different geographic collection (Moulitharan et al, 2020). This study can be used to understand the basic biological parameters of these clupeid fishes.…”