2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00338-020-01993-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Length–weight relationships to quantify biomass for motile coral reef cryptofauna

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations in cryptic community density, diversity and biomass were strongly influenced by microhabitat type, contributing to an emerging picture of microhabitats being a key predictor of the cryptofauna (Counsell et al, 2018 ; Enochs et al, 2011 ; Enochs & Manzello, 2012b ; Fraser et al, 2021a ; Fraser, Stuart‐Smith, et al, 2020 ; Pisapia et al, 2020 ; Takada et al, 2016 ; Wolfe, Desbiens, et al, 2020 ). While dead coral and rubble hosted a greater density and diversity of motile cryptofauna compared to living corals, this was dominated by a greater availability of small fauna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in cryptic community density, diversity and biomass were strongly influenced by microhabitat type, contributing to an emerging picture of microhabitats being a key predictor of the cryptofauna (Counsell et al, 2018 ; Enochs et al, 2011 ; Enochs & Manzello, 2012b ; Fraser et al, 2021a ; Fraser, Stuart‐Smith, et al, 2020 ; Pisapia et al, 2020 ; Takada et al, 2016 ; Wolfe, Desbiens, et al, 2020 ). While dead coral and rubble hosted a greater density and diversity of motile cryptofauna compared to living corals, this was dominated by a greater availability of small fauna.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When analyzing different reef substrates, Enochs and Manzello (2012b) observed that the highest richness in cryptofauna was surprisingly found within coral rubble, which hosted significantly higher cryptic diversity than healthy corals. Moreover, previous research has suggested that cryptofaunal abundance and diversity are linked with habitat type (Wolfe et al, 2020), and influenced by rubble shapes and complexity (Biondi et al, 2020). Branching rubble fragments appear to support more biodiversity and animal abundance than massive rubble (Biondi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The complex three-dimensional skeletal structures of scleractinian corals host a variety of sessile and mobile animals of variable size called cryptofauna (Enochs, 2012). Organisms from the reef cryptofauna are essential for the functionality of coral reef ecosystems, both in terms of biomass (they constitute the largest part of reef 's diversity; Richter et al, 2001) and functionality, since they contribute to the aggregation and recycling of nutrients, providing biomass upwards in the trophic net (Richter et al, 2001;Kramer et al, 2013;Wolfe et al, 2020). Even coral rubble, dead coral skeletal frameworks detached from the substrate, has been shown to host a rich and diverse community and, for this reason, has been used as an indicator of reef diversity and environmental impact (Takada et al, 2014;Wee et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density conversions were performed at the lowest level of taxonomy possible within each replicate. Biomass was calculated per individual using existing length‐weight conversion factors for motile cryptofauna (Wolfe et al, 2020 ). Novel length‐weight relationships were established for Linckia multifora and the Gobiidae (Figure S1 ), which primarily comprised Eviota spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%