1998
DOI: 10.3109/17453679809000943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lengthening of an above-knee amputation stump with the llizarov technique–a case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stump lengthening of the preserved proximal femur after high above-knee amputation with the (Enneking et al 1993) Ilizarov technique has been reported by several authors (Eldridge et al 1990, Park et al 1997, Horesh et al 1998). Other authors (Zweymüller 1978, Persson andBroome 1994) have implanted endoprostheses in the distal part of the stump to lengthen it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Stump lengthening of the preserved proximal femur after high above-knee amputation with the (Enneking et al 1993) Ilizarov technique has been reported by several authors (Eldridge et al 1990, Park et al 1997, Horesh et al 1998). Other authors (Zweymüller 1978, Persson andBroome 1994) have implanted endoprostheses in the distal part of the stump to lengthen it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several reports suggest lengthening is a reasonable option for improving prosthetic wear and helps avoid the need for revision surgeries that normally involve amputation of the limb at a higher level to overcome the deformity [9][10][11][12]. Studies suggest below-knee amputation is superior to above-knee amputation, with better gait efficiency and prosthesis fit [8,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8] We could find only two other cases of the lengthening of below-elbow amputation stumps by the Ilizarov technique, only one of them for a congenital abnormality. 8 Abe et al 9 also reported a similar case, but used unilateral fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 We used the Ilizarov technique to lengthen the forearm bones because it is less invasive and can provide simultaneous stretching of the soft tissues. 4,5,7,[11][12][13] We had no problems with protrusion of the bones through the skin. The Ilizarov technique stabilises the bone fragments in all planes, and by the use of thin wires, minimises damage to the soft tissues, periosteum and blood supply to the bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%