2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lensless coherent imaging of proteins and supramolecular assemblies: Efficient phase retrieval by the charge flipping algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Short wavelength extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and soft X-ray beams have unique potential for imaging reactions at buried interfaces because they can penetrate visibly opaque materials, provide chemically specific contrast, and also image nanoscale features. In particular, by combining coherent beams from either high harmonic generation (HHG) or X-ray free electron lasers (XFELs) with coherent diffractive imaging (CDI), it is now possible to achieve spatial resolutions that are comparable to the illuminating wavelength in the X-ray region for the first time. , Accordingly, CDI has found a range of applications in transmission and reflection geometries to investigate nanoscale strain, , semiconductor structures, and for biological imaging. Because no optical elements are needed between the sample and detector, coherent diffractive imaging is the most photon efficient form of imaging and can be nondestructive with no charging effects or resolution loss with depth . Moreover, the contrast mechanisms in EUV CDI are relatively straightforward and intrinsically high: amplitude images exhibit high sensitivity to material composition, while phase images are exquisitely sensitive to both material composition and topography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Short wavelength extreme ultraviolet (EUV) and soft X-ray beams have unique potential for imaging reactions at buried interfaces because they can penetrate visibly opaque materials, provide chemically specific contrast, and also image nanoscale features. In particular, by combining coherent beams from either high harmonic generation (HHG) or X-ray free electron lasers (XFELs) with coherent diffractive imaging (CDI), it is now possible to achieve spatial resolutions that are comparable to the illuminating wavelength in the X-ray region for the first time. , Accordingly, CDI has found a range of applications in transmission and reflection geometries to investigate nanoscale strain, , semiconductor structures, and for biological imaging. Because no optical elements are needed between the sample and detector, coherent diffractive imaging is the most photon efficient form of imaging and can be nondestructive with no charging effects or resolution loss with depth . Moreover, the contrast mechanisms in EUV CDI are relatively straightforward and intrinsically high: amplitude images exhibit high sensitivity to material composition, while phase images are exquisitely sensitive to both material composition and topography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, by combining coherent, short-wavelength beams from either high harmonic generation (HHG) [10] or X-ray free electron lasers (XFELs) [11] with coherent diffractive imaging (CDI) [12][13][14][15], it is now possible to reach near-wavelength resolution imaging in the EUV and X-ray regions for the first time [16,17]. Accordingly, CDI has found a range of applications in transmission and reflection geometries [18][19][20] to investigate nanoscale strain [21,22], semiconductor structures [18], and for biological imaging [23][24][25]. EUV/X-ray CDI can be non-destructive and suffers no charging effects or resolution loss with depth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practicality of directly determining three-dimensional structures of noncrystalline biological materials using x-ray diffraction patterns is still being assessed (34). FIGURE 7 Comparison between observed equatorial intensity profiles and those calculated from the best-fit models.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%