2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lenticulostriate vasculopathy in neonates: Is it a marker of cerebral insult? Critical review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence, exact pathophysiology, and significance are still unknown. 28 Fabre et al 29 showed in their retrospective study of 58 neonates with LSV that low-grade LSV (one or two echogenic branches) should be considered as a normal variant. On the other hand, all children with high-grade LSV (at least three echogenic branches) should have close neurological follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence, exact pathophysiology, and significance are still unknown. 28 Fabre et al 29 showed in their retrospective study of 58 neonates with LSV that low-grade LSV (one or two echogenic branches) should be considered as a normal variant. On the other hand, all children with high-grade LSV (at least three echogenic branches) should have close neurological follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precise incidence and long-term clinical significance of LSV are unclear, and therefore, clinicians have little information with which to counsel parents of infants who have this ultrasound finding. 3 Furthermore, one prior study has demonstrated that there is poor interrater agreement in the identification of LSV by radiologists, leading to even more uncertainty about the significance of this finding. 2 Clinical pathologic correlation has demonstrated that LSV represents thickening of the lenticulostriate arteries supplying the basal ganglia and thalamus, making this typically invisible vasculature apparent on ultrasound.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence of LSV ranges from 0.3% to 32%, depending on the population studied. [2][3][4] Because of the technological advances in cerebral ultrasound imaging and growing awareness among doctors of this cerebral ultrasound finding, the incidence of LSV identification has increased since the finding was first recognized. 2,5 The frequencies of transducers used for neonatal cerebral ultrasound 3 decades ago were 5-7.5 MHz, whereas the frequencies of contemporary neonatal cerebral ultrasound transducers range from 10 to 15 MHz, which greatly amplifies echogenicities within the cerebral tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] Because of the technological advances in cerebral ultrasound imaging and growing awareness among doctors of this cerebral ultrasound finding, the incidence of LSV identification has increased since the finding was first recognized. 2,5 The frequencies of transducers used for neonatal cerebral ultrasound 3 decades ago were 5-7.5 MHz, whereas the frequencies of contemporary neonatal cerebral ultrasound transducers range from 10 to 15 MHz, which greatly amplifies echogenicities within the cerebral tissue. 6 Although LSV is not a rare finding on cranial ultrasound examination, and despite cranial ultrasound examinations having become a routine examination for neonates admitted to intensive care units, the clinical meaning of LSV remains unclear, and much remains to be understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation