2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3774(01)00179-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LEPA and trickle irrigation of cotton in the Southeast Anatolia Project (GAP) area in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
51
0
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
51
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of total yield, number of fruit per plant, fruits size, and plant biomass production with an increased amount of water stress level of this test was consistent with previous work conducted on tomato and other crops such as cotton [25,26]. Water stress consistently reduced production of the most valuable extra-large sized fruit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The reduction of total yield, number of fruit per plant, fruits size, and plant biomass production with an increased amount of water stress level of this test was consistent with previous work conducted on tomato and other crops such as cotton [25,26]. Water stress consistently reduced production of the most valuable extra-large sized fruit.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Yazar et al (2002) reported that cotton WUE under drip irrigation was 19.5 kg ha −1 mm −1 in Turkey while Aujla et al (2005) determined that the cotton WUE in India ranged from 14.6 kg ha −1 mm −1 to 22.7 kg ha −1 mm −1 . In this study, the WUE values varied from 8.1 kg ha −1 mm −1 to 11.3 kg ha −1 mm −1 .…”
Section: Cotton Water Use Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grattan et al (1988) cited better weed control as the major factor in the yield increases observed in their study. However, Yazar et al (2002) obtained similar yield results for both irrigation methods in cotton. Brilay et al (2003) also found a similar yield and fruit size in peach trees irrigated under drip and subsurface drip irrigation.…”
Section: Fruit Yield and Wp Agr Response To Irrigation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 66%