2010
DOI: 10.1128/aem.00155-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lepidopteran-Active Variable-Region Sequence Imparts Coleopteran Activity in eCry3.1Ab, an Engineered Bacillus thuringiensis Hybrid Insecticidal Protein

Abstract: A unique, coleopteran-active protein, termed eCry3.1Ab, was generated following variable-region exchange of a Bacillus thuringiensis lepidopteran-active protein, Cry1Ab, with a Cry3A region. Our results support the hypothesis that this variable-region exchange is responsible for imparting strong bioactivity against the larvae of western corn rootworm (WCR) (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte), a pest species which is not susceptible to either parent protein sequence. This study demonstrates the potential o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Cry1Ac, binding specificity governed by domain III is dependent on recognition of GalNAc residues in receptor proteins (Burton et al, 1999;JuratFuentes and Adang, 2004). A clear example of domain III determining specificity comes from introduction of rootworm specificity in Cry3Aa by replacing domain III with the same domain from Cry1Ab (Walters et al, 2010). This observation would be unexpected based on the specificity of Cry1Ab, which is inactive against coleopteran larvae, and suggests that significant similarity in domains II and/or III may not be an appropriate predictor of specificity for engineered toxins.…”
Section: Specificity Level Vi: Binding To Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the case of Cry1Ac, binding specificity governed by domain III is dependent on recognition of GalNAc residues in receptor proteins (Burton et al, 1999;JuratFuentes and Adang, 2004). A clear example of domain III determining specificity comes from introduction of rootworm specificity in Cry3Aa by replacing domain III with the same domain from Cry1Ab (Walters et al, 2010). This observation would be unexpected based on the specificity of Cry1Ab, which is inactive against coleopteran larvae, and suggests that significant similarity in domains II and/or III may not be an appropriate predictor of specificity for engineered toxins.…”
Section: Specificity Level Vi: Binding To Receptorsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A fusion toxin comprising a truncated version of Cry1Ba and domain II from Cry1Ia was also shown to be toxic to both coleopteran and lepidopteran pests (Naimov et al 2001;Naimov et al 2003). More recently, a hybrid Cry1Ab/3A toxin which was toxic to the western corn rootworm was also created (Walters et al 2010). Finally, optimization of Bt crystal proteins through DNA shuffling has also been reported (Lassner and Bedbrook 2001;Craveiro et al 2010).…”
Section: Engineering Of Novel Cry Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Genetically engineered Cry3A toxins (mCry3A and eCry3.1Ab) displaying increased activity against D. virgifera larvae (Walters et al 2008(Walters et al , 2010 are currently used in some Bt maize varieties (Table 15.1). Modified (Mod) Cry1A toxins targeting lepidopteran larvae and effective against larvae lacking the primary Cry1A toxin receptor (Soberón et al 2007) are a clear alternative to currently used lepidopteran-specific traits.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%