1993
DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90280-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leprosy in women: Characteristics and repercussions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of leprosy in females (44.5%) was lower than in males (55.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (χ 2 = 1.17, df = 1, p = 0.2783); interestingly, a higher percentage of MB leprosy was observed in males than females (73.7% versus 59.6%) during both periods (χ 2 = 13.99, 1 df, p<0.0002). These findings reinforce the concept that immune responses against M. leprae are stronger in females than in males (Olrich et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The incidence of leprosy in females (44.5%) was lower than in males (55.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (χ 2 = 1.17, df = 1, p = 0.2783); interestingly, a higher percentage of MB leprosy was observed in males than females (73.7% versus 59.6%) during both periods (χ 2 = 13.99, 1 df, p<0.0002). These findings reinforce the concept that immune responses against M. leprae are stronger in females than in males (Olrich et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…household with nuclear family v. that with the in-laws and nuclear family). Ulrich (1993) cites the example of a study conducted in Pakistan which found that women who were less mobile showed less compliance with leprosy treatment. Yet we do not know if conditions which facilitate mobility (like the presence of an older chaperone) are associated with marital status and type of household.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 A study in India revealed that the incidence of deformities in males was more than twice as much as in females for grade I as well as grade II deformities (n = 2285).…”
Section: Gender Difference In Deformity Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%