2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.118.111801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lepton-Flavor-Dependent Angular Analysis of BK*+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

19
301
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
19
301
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 This confirms a tension seen in an earlier analysis by LHCb that used only 1 fb −1 of data [16]. The recent measurements of P 5 by Belle and ATLAS [8,9] are also in good agreement with the LHCb result and show tensions with the SM. The analysis by the CMS collaboration is compatible with both the SM and the LHCb result [10].…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)176supporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2 This confirms a tension seen in an earlier analysis by LHCb that used only 1 fb −1 of data [16]. The recent measurements of P 5 by Belle and ATLAS [8,9] are also in good agreement with the LHCb result and show tensions with the SM. The analysis by the CMS collaboration is compatible with both the SM and the LHCb result [10].…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)176supporting
confidence: 78%
“…[78]. Neglecting lepton mass effects the CP -averaged S i reduce to the longitudinal polarisation fraction F L = S 1c , the forward-backward asymmetry A FB = 3 4 S 6s and the remaining S 3,4,5,7,8,9 . Additional ratios of S i have been proposed as observables, for which form factor uncertainties cancel at leading order [79,80].…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)176mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, the LHCb results point towards a significant effect of the lepton flavor universality violation in this process. Recently, Belle Collaboration [26] found out that the angular observable P 5 agrees with the SM prediction much better for electrons than for muons. This important result suggests that it is much more likely that beyond the SM effects are present in the second generation of leptons, and that there are currently no effects in b → se + e − which would not be accounted for in the SM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3 The 'cleanness' of these observables refers to the SM prediction, in the presence of New Physics larger theoretical uncertainties are expected. We didn't include the Q 4 and Q 5 observables measured recently by the Belle collaboration [33].…”
Section: Fitsmentioning
confidence: 99%