Les divisions de la logique selon Albert le Grand

Brumberg-Chaumont, Julie

doi:10.1484/m.sa-eb.5.101364

Cited by 5 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So one must admit that in the syllogism that fails according to the matter it is not perfectly and really the case that [the conclusion necessary follows] 'certain things being posited' [i.e. it does not follow the definition of the syllogism] [2], p. 239. independent item in the world of logical ontology, contrary to what was contended by Robert Kilwardby, 9 but only a form in need of instantiation (see [12,14,15]).…”

Section: Tensions and Controversies Over The Degree Of Independence O...mentioning

confidence: 96%

“…If we accept ut nunc assertoric proposition, which we should not, we could end up with an argument (apparently) in XMM where the two premises are true, and the conclusion is false: C*="Everything moving is a man (be it the case); every horse is possibly moving, every horse is possibly a man" 12 (A similar example with "moving," "animal," "man" is also given).…”

Section: The Distinction Between "As-of-now" and "Unrestricted" Asser...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Albert often professes a very different position in his later works, as in paraphrases on the Topics and on the Sophisiti Elenchi (see[12], p. 372-373) 19. The anonymous commentary on the Prior Analytics in the ms. Bruges Stadbibliotek cod.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Logical Hylomorphism in the Thirteenth Century

Brumberg-Chaumont¹

2022

Studies in Universal Logic

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter is focused on thirteenth-century logical hylomorphism. It describes an original chapter in the history of logical form, when argument had "substantial forms," namely syllogistic forms, and when logical matter did "matter," as much as logical form, when defining the scope of logic and the essence of the syllogism. Various senses of logical "matter" are distinguished and the idea of a Latin "material logic" is defended. The study of a series of vexing issues, especially puzzles in modal syllogistic, shows how many arguments lingered in a "syllogistic limbo" at that period. The contribution of logical matter was such that the possibility of a logical "salvation" of these arguments, as syllogisms or as a formally valid arguments, remained undecided.

show abstract

Section: Tensions and Controversies Over The Degree Of Independence O...mentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: The Distinction Between "As-of-now" and "Unrestricted" Asser...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Logical Hylomorphism in the Thirteenth Century

Brumberg-Chaumont¹

2022

Studies in Universal Logic

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Meanings of ‘Logic’ in the Thirteenth Century

Storck

2015

Log. Univers.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of this article is to call attention to different ways in which logic was understood in the thirteenth century. Thus, it will recall some relevant historical facts related to the problem of classifying logic among scientific disciplines. This problem involved methodological questions linked to the form of presenting both the scientific disciplines and the books by which they were transmitted. Next, it will stress the contexts that led Medievals to raise questions about the nature of logic and why these issues were necessarily accompanied by considerations on the relation of logic to the disciplines dealing with language. Finally, it will analyze a change in perspective with respect to the status of logic, which moves from a science of human discourse to a science of mental acts.Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 01A35, 03A05.

show abstract

Universal Logic and Aristotelian Logic: Formality and Essence of Logic

Brumberg-Chaumont

2015

Log. Univers.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rediscovery of Aristotle's works on syllogisms in the Latin world, especially the Sophistici Elenchi and then the Prior Analytics, gave rise to sophisticated views on the nature of syllogistic form and syllogistic matter in the thirteenth century. It led to debates on the ontology of the syllogism as studied in the Prior Analytics, i.e. the syllogism made of letters and the four logical constants a/e/i/o, with deep consequences on the definition of logic as a universal method for all sciences and as a science itself.Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 01A35; Secondary 03A05.

show abstract

Les divisions de la logique selon Albert le Grand

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Logical Hylomorphism in the Thirteenth Century

Logical Hylomorphism in the Thirteenth Century

The Meanings of ‘Logic’ in the Thirteenth Century

Universal Logic and Aristotelian Logic: Formality and Essence of Logic

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About