2012
DOI: 10.3917/cca.182.0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les facteurs d'influence de la qualité de l'audit : Perception des préparateurs de l'information financière

Abstract: Résumé Cette étude analyse les critères d’influence de la qualité de l’audit sur la base d’un cadre théorique articulé autour de trois familles : la mission, l’équipe/le cabinet et la réglementation. L’objectif est d’évaluer la perception de 55 critères influençant la qualité de l’audit auprès de 131 préparateurs de l’information financière. Les résultats révèlent que les préparateurs prennent en considération l’ensemble des critères présentés en accordant une place significative à ceux liés à la mission et à … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…So, DeFond and Zhang [4] provide output indicators of the audit process (significant errors, auditor communication ability, the quality of financial reporting, and measures based on the perception of stakeholders) and indicators on the inputs of the audit process (auditor size, the auditor specialization by industry, and audit fees). Gonthier-Besacier et al [18,19] group 55 indicators in three categories: (1) the attributes of the audit engagement; (2) the characteristics of the interaction between the auditor and the representatives of the firm audited (the management, the audit committee, and other corporate governance structures), and the characteristics of the audit team and the audit firm; and (3) the characteristics of the audit regulation. In turn, Du and Lai [15] considers that it is useful to analyse the audit quality based on the characteristics of the audited entities and audit firms, finding a better comparability of the financial information between firms audited by the same auditor.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, DeFond and Zhang [4] provide output indicators of the audit process (significant errors, auditor communication ability, the quality of financial reporting, and measures based on the perception of stakeholders) and indicators on the inputs of the audit process (auditor size, the auditor specialization by industry, and audit fees). Gonthier-Besacier et al [18,19] group 55 indicators in three categories: (1) the attributes of the audit engagement; (2) the characteristics of the interaction between the auditor and the representatives of the firm audited (the management, the audit committee, and other corporate governance structures), and the characteristics of the audit team and the audit firm; and (3) the characteristics of the audit regulation. In turn, Du and Lai [15] considers that it is useful to analyse the audit quality based on the characteristics of the audited entities and audit firms, finding a better comparability of the financial information between firms audited by the same auditor.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Auditor competence and auditor independence are the central concepts of traditional research on audit quality (Gonthier-Besacier, et al, 2012).…”
Section: Earnings Management and Audit Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afin d'atteindre notre objectif de recherche nous allons utiliser une démarche empirique similaire à celles utilisée par Carcello et al (1992) et Gonthier-Besacier et al (2012). Une analyse a été fondée sur un questionnaire adressé à 87 préparateurs d'information comptable.…”
Section: Méthodologieunclassified