ABSTRACT. A phylogenetic analysis of 36 species provides a test for the taxonomy and the history of Early Cretaceous spatangoids. Most taxonomic units from genera to suborders are consistent with the proposed phylogenetic framework. We retain Hemiasterina, Micrasterina, Hemiasteridae, Schizasteridae, Hemiaster, Heteraster, Mecaster, and Periaster as original monophyletic groups. However, all of these clades originate without the classical apomorphies normally ascribed to them. We suggest a revision of their diagnoses and of the generic attributions of basal species. Some illdefined, 'primitive', and paraphyletic taxa are recognised: Toxaster, Epiaster, Palhemiaster, and Toxasteridae. Even if they do not have phylogenetic meaning, they are retained here, pending a more complete revision.KEY WORDS: Spatangoida, Echinoidea, phylogeny, systematics, Cretaceous.T H E phylogeny of higher-level taxa of echinoids (order and above) is now considered to be robust (Smith 1981(Smith , 1984. In this framework, the order Spatangoida appears as a well-supported monophyletic group, with its first occurrence in the lowermost Cretaceous (Berriasian). While the monophyly of Spatangoida is largely consensual, the precise origin of the order is still unclear and has been the subject of several hypotheses in the last 50 years. Eble (2000) noted the lack of phylogenetic information for early Spatangoida and Holasteroida. Roots of these two orders are generally sought in disasteroid-like ancestors. Beurlen (1934) and Mortensen (1950) proposed Metaporinus as the ancestor of the Spatangoida. However, this hypothesis implied a reversion to a compact structure of the apical system because the first Disasteroida had already evolved by extension and disjunction of the apical system. Durham and Melville (1957) rooted the Spatangoida within the Galeropygidae. Their alternative hypothesis excluded the reversion but implied a stratigraphical gap of more than 50 myr. Later, Durham (1966) suggested that the Holasteroida, Spatangoida and Cassiduloida arose from a common ancestor at the beginning of the Jurassic. Afterwards, most authors retained the hypothesis of Devriès (1960a) that holasteroids and spatangoids both arose from disasteroids (Fischer 1966;Mintz 1966; Smith 1981 Smith , 1984. According to Devriès (1960a) the first spatangoid is Toxaster laffittei from the Berriasian. This species displays transitional features between Disasteroida and Spatangoida, such as a compact apical system and protamphisternous plastron. Other transitional forms to the more derived Spatangoida are found in nominal species such as Toxaster holasteroides and T. africanus, that show a progressive compaction of the apical system to an ethmophract pattern. However, consensus is still lacking. For example, Clavel (in Jablonski and Bottjer 1990) rejected Toxaster laffittei as a Spatangoida and moved it to Holasteroida as Holaster cordatus. In this latter hypothesis, Proholaster auberti is a good candidate for ancestor of the Spatangoida. Smith (1984) proposed an e...