2020
DOI: 10.3726/b16428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les origines du baby-boom en Suisse au prisme des parcours féminins

Abstract: réinventer la langue de Molière. Merci également à Delphine, Marie et Myriam pour leur précieuse collaboration dans les moments de détresse de codage de données et de m'avoir accompagnée dans mes nombreux allers-retours à la cave. Merci à Aude M. et Marthe pour leur sens de la solidarité, les nocturnes et tous les moments fous que nous avons partagés au cours de notre assistanat, qu'il serait bien trop long de lister ici. Je ne saurais également trop remercier Aude T., Claire, Eduardo, Grégoire, Julia et Natha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
(359 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, while women are still discriminated regarding their health, revenue, or residential isolation (based on our current data, see Baeriswyl, 2018;Oris et al, 2017), there are advantages of recent historical trends in close friendships. We have to state that the cohorts studied, even the younger born at the latest in 1946, grew and evolved in a Swiss society still strongly marked by gender inequalities; most have been socialized during the "conservative restoration" of the interwar period (Duvoisin, 2020). For now, our results confirm women's advantage in terms of social relations as mentioned in the literature (Arber et al, 2003;Chambers, 2018), while stressing that this can be relatively new concerning friendship in older age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In particular, while women are still discriminated regarding their health, revenue, or residential isolation (based on our current data, see Baeriswyl, 2018;Oris et al, 2017), there are advantages of recent historical trends in close friendships. We have to state that the cohorts studied, even the younger born at the latest in 1946, grew and evolved in a Swiss society still strongly marked by gender inequalities; most have been socialized during the "conservative restoration" of the interwar period (Duvoisin, 2020). For now, our results confirm women's advantage in terms of social relations as mentioned in the literature (Arber et al, 2003;Chambers, 2018), while stressing that this can be relatively new concerning friendship in older age.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…All the channels of socialisation (families, schools, youth movements, churches, etc.) promoted a role of women as mother and spouse 65 . Second, besides this most crucial primary socialisation in early life, empirical evidence further showed that although the shift in subjective perceptions of social gender roles towards being less conservative over the last 30 years in Switzerland due to secondary socialisations during the life course, importantly, the social practices were changing across time and generations to a much lower extent: Women were still much more than men engaged in social activities in the private space and the managers of social relationships, especially family relationships and friendship 66,67 (for further discussions on these issues see e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The roots of this trend go back to the 19 th century fertility transition (David & Sanderson, 1987), but it was during the Baby Boom era that the two-child family became more widely adopted in many Western countries (Brée, 2017;Frejka, 2008b;Van Bavel et al, 2018). Based on scarce qualitative studies, it seems plausible that during the Baby Boom era, the idea of having a family with precisely two children attained a normative character (Duvoisin, 2017;Hilevych & Rusterholz, 2018). This entailed both a stronger imperative to get married and start a family and a more restrictive norm on stopping after two children, or at least an increasing social stigma on larger family sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it seems that by the end of the 1930s, parenthood and family life experienced a renaissance while alternative life trajectories were dismissed (Hülsken, 2010;Koropeckyj-Cox, Pienta, & Brown, 2007). Limiting family size on the other hand was hardly new, but developments in contraceptives (Barrusse, 2014;Rusterholz, 2015) and increasing costs of childrearing (Duvoisin, 2017;Hilevych & Rusterholz, 2018;Rusterholz, 2017) might have resulted in a strengthening of the norm to not have more than two children. In any case, more and more people were having two children and understanding the rise of the two-child family might therefore contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms that have brought about the Baby Boom itself.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%