2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LES/PDF based modeling of soot–turbulence interactions in turbulent flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this basis for turbulence modeling, three additional components are required for modeling soot evolution: (a) a turbulent combustion model to describe the interactions between turbulence, gas-phase chemistry, and molecular transport; (b) a chemical kinetics model that links gas-phase combustion and soot precursor evolution to soot evolution through nucleation, condensation and surface growth; and (c) a soot population balance model and solution methodology that allows nanoparticles to be represented in a computationally tractable manner. Prior studies have shown that for flames that are not close to extinction, different combustion models produce comparable results [15,16] . Therefore, the focus here will be on the latter two modeling components mentioned above.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this basis for turbulence modeling, three additional components are required for modeling soot evolution: (a) a turbulent combustion model to describe the interactions between turbulence, gas-phase chemistry, and molecular transport; (b) a chemical kinetics model that links gas-phase combustion and soot precursor evolution to soot evolution through nucleation, condensation and surface growth; and (c) a soot population balance model and solution methodology that allows nanoparticles to be represented in a computationally tractable manner. Prior studies have shown that for flames that are not close to extinction, different combustion models produce comparable results [15,16] . Therefore, the focus here will be on the latter two modeling components mentioned above.…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semi-empirical acetylene-based inception mechanism produces very good reproduction of soot volume fraction for smaller hydrocarbon flames [4,5,23] but vastly underpredicts inception for higher hydrocarbons such as kerosene [25] . Among the PAH-based nucleation models, those based on pyrene (A4) as soot precursor have often underpredicted the soot volume for ethylene and small-hydrocarbon flames [15,26] , while reasonable agreement was obtained for jet fuels [14] .…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The over prediction of soot volume fraction can be directly related with the over prediction of soot nucleation at high temperatures (in the absence of radiation). The balance of production and consumption in PAH are accurately captured, resulting in accurate predictions of maximum soot volume fraction location when compared to Mueller et al [10] and Donde et al [44]. The over prediction of soot volume fraction by Muller et al [10] can be attributed to the usage of higher sub filter dissipation rate.…”
Section: Soot Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The over prediction of soot volume fraction can be directly related with the over estimation of surface growth. The balance of surface growth and oxidation are not accurately included, resulting in accurate predictions of maximum soot volume fraction when compared to Mueller et al [10] and Donde et al [44]. In LES study of Donde et al [44], the soot-turbulence interaction increased the net soot production.…”
Section: Soot Turbulence Interactionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is certainly the case when finite-rate chemistry is relevant, which can be expected for the relatively low temperatures encountered in fires and more precisely for toxicity calculations (such as CO). An example of state-of-the-art LES/PDF calculations, involving soot, is found in [18], while a recent review on the progress in PDF methods is found in [19].…”
Section: Theory and Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%