There has been a striking continuity in some of the basic sonic features of popular revolt and protest since the Middle Ages. In the Middle Ages, as now, people descended into the streets en masse, marched, chanted slogans, shouted angry cries, and smashed things. As the recent Occupy and Arab Spring movements show, collectively seizing public space by imposing people's bodies and voices onto that space remains powerful today much as it did seven centuries ago. At the same time, the relationship between these immediate sonic events and their perception by those who were not direct witnesses is quite different. If the protesters at the 1968 Democratic Convention could chant "The whole world is watching" to Chicago police to remind them that they were on a global stage, the cries of the rebels in Bruges in 1302, London in 1381, or Paris in 1418 were seen -or, rather, heard -solely by those in proximity to the action.The tension between the immediate event and mediated experience exists, of course, in the modern era, but in the Middle Ages these moments of noise and clamor within the vital oral public sphere were at a particular disconnect with existing accounts of them, recorded in chronicles or court documents composed by clerical authors and others hostile to such popular expressions of political will. Because writing in the preprint culture of the Middle Ages was dominated by those generally (although not exclusively) sympathetic to power-holding elites,
Radical History ReviewPublished by Duke University Press