1968
DOI: 10.1515/9783111656540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les principes de protection des dessins et modèles dans les pays du Marché Commun

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…French literature is of the clear opinion that the copyright and design laws' protection requirements are different (Kamina 2001, no. 40, p. 3258; 2003, p. 28; Lucas and Lucas, 2001, p. 93; Pérot‐Morel 2005, p. 9; Piatti, 2004). However, some think that novelty is redundant because own character includes novelty (De Candé, 2003, p. 396, citing Humblot, 2003, p. 990; Massa and Strowel, 2003, p. 73).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…French literature is of the clear opinion that the copyright and design laws' protection requirements are different (Kamina 2001, no. 40, p. 3258; 2003, p. 28; Lucas and Lucas, 2001, p. 93; Pérot‐Morel 2005, p. 9; Piatti, 2004). However, some think that novelty is redundant because own character includes novelty (De Candé, 2003, p. 396, citing Humblot, 2003, p. 990; Massa and Strowel, 2003, p. 73).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to this theory, there should be no criterion to distinguish between art and industry because otherwise it would force courts to make subjective aesthetic judgements (Suthersanen, 2000, p. 137). In other words, art is “dedicated to unity in its most diverse manifestations, it can be defined neither by beauty nor even by the aesthetic feeling it tends to arouse” (Pérot‐Morel, pp. 46–7) 13…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quoi qu'il en soit, c'est la diversité des règles relatives à la protection de créations de forme qui interpelle le juriste, le droit des dessins et modèles étant parmi les moins harmonisés . L'harmonisation juridique internationale en soi est débattue, certains auteurs déplorant les disparités, menant à un manque de sécurité juridique, de clarté et de précision (Passa, , §10; Perot‐Morel, ), d'autres pointant les bénéfices d'une marge d'appréciation des Etats indispensable pour préserver les spécificités locales (Kingsbury, ). Il s'agit également d'un débat qui dépasse le cadre de cet article, mais dont nous tenons pleinement compte.…”
unclassified