2003
DOI: 10.3917/dev.032.0143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les représentations d'attachement du jeune enfant. Développement d'un système de codage pour les histoires à compléter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
2
13

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
30
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…However, birth order is confounded with age, and after including both variables in the analysis, older children generally had secure attachment classifications more frequently than did younger children (no significant birth order effect was found). This result is in line with Miljkovitch, Pierrehumbert, Karmaniola, and Halfon (2003) who also assessed child attachment in preschool years (3 to 5 years) and used the same attachment measure but evaluated the ASCT by a self-developed Q-sort technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, birth order is confounded with age, and after including both variables in the analysis, older children generally had secure attachment classifications more frequently than did younger children (no significant birth order effect was found). This result is in line with Miljkovitch, Pierrehumbert, Karmaniola, and Halfon (2003) who also assessed child attachment in preschool years (3 to 5 years) and used the same attachment measure but evaluated the ASCT by a self-developed Q-sort technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The stories involved handling materials, and covered themes such as transgression, fear, separation from and reunion with parents, and the loss of a dog. The narratives were coded by the clinician research assistants using the Q-set procedure which was developed by Pierrehumbert (Miljkovitch, Pierrehumbert, Karmaniola, & Halfon, 2003). This resulted in continuous scores, which were obtained by comparing the children's individual Q-sort description with the criterion sort provided by experts for a prototypical child using Main and Cassidy's four patterns (secure, avoidant, ambivalent and disorganized) (Miljkovitch et al, 2003).…”
Section: Measures Attachment Story Completion Task (Acst) Les Histoiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This percentage was very similar to that obtained by van Ijzendoorn (1995) for the link between parents' attachment representations (assessed with the AAI) and children's attachment behaviour (assessed with the SSP). Miljkovitch, Pierrehumbert, Karmaniola, and Halfon (2003) also observed significant correlations between mothers' and children's attachment representations, assessed with the AAI and the ASCT respectively. Using a coding system based on the continuous scores of the ASCT that was different to that of Gloger-Tippelt and colleagues (2002), they obtained similar results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%