2016
DOI: 10.4000/resf.1183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les réseaux de personnages de science-fiction : échantillons de lectures intermédiaires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice, it is hard to handle more than a few works of fiction when using either of the previous approaches (direct annotation vs. predefined character index). A workaround is to turn to crowdsourcing, as Rochat & Kaplan do in [209] to constitute their own indices. Interestingly, this study is also characterized by its multimedia nature, as the authors consider a corpus of science-fiction works including novels, comics, movies, TV series, and video games.…”
Section: Vincent Labatut and Xavier Bostmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In practice, it is hard to handle more than a few works of fiction when using either of the previous approaches (direct annotation vs. predefined character index). A workaround is to turn to crowdsourcing, as Rochat & Kaplan do in [209] to constitute their own indices. Interestingly, this study is also characterized by its multimedia nature, as the authors consider a corpus of science-fiction works including novels, comics, movies, TV series, and video games.…”
Section: Vincent Labatut and Xavier Bostmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Certain authors focus on more sociological traits. In [209], Rochat & Triclot are interested in the representation and relative position of science and politics in science-fiction works. Through crowdsourcing, they manually define an attribute representing whether the main occupation of each character is mainly related to Politics, Technology, or Science, but also Family, Religion, or Art.…”
Section: Attributementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations