1996
DOI: 10.2516/ogst:1996027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les terrains jurassiques du sondage de Couy (Cher, France). Leur analyse séquentielle détaillée à partir de la description des carottes et des courbes diagraphiques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, our detailed core description during the process of high‐resolution (2 to 4 cm) MS measurements do not show any sedimentological feature, indicator of hiatuses. Despite Peti et al (2017) have suggested potential hard grounds and marine gully erosions (Figures 1 and 2), previous reports on the Sancerre core (Gély et al, 1996) and our sedimentological description do not show significant erosional surfaces or hiatuses over most of the Pliensbachian‐Toarcian interval. One exception is the Pliensbachian–Toarcian transition or rather the top of Pliensbachian, which may be the subject of marine gully erosion, but does not show any biostratigraphic gap (Gély et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Also, our detailed core description during the process of high‐resolution (2 to 4 cm) MS measurements do not show any sedimentological feature, indicator of hiatuses. Despite Peti et al (2017) have suggested potential hard grounds and marine gully erosions (Figures 1 and 2), previous reports on the Sancerre core (Gély et al, 1996) and our sedimentological description do not show significant erosional surfaces or hiatuses over most of the Pliensbachian‐Toarcian interval. One exception is the Pliensbachian–Toarcian transition or rather the top of Pliensbachian, which may be the subject of marine gully erosion, but does not show any biostratigraphic gap (Gély et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…Despite Peti et al (2017) have suggested potential hard grounds and marine gully erosions (Figures 1 and 2), previous reports on the Sancerre core (Gély et al, 1996) and our sedimentological description do not show significant erosional surfaces or hiatuses over most of the Pliensbachian‐Toarcian interval. One exception is the Pliensbachian–Toarcian transition or rather the top of Pliensbachian, which may be the subject of marine gully erosion, but does not show any biostratigraphic gap (Gély et al, 1996). Previous cyclostratigraphic analyses also suggest potential condensation in the uppermost part of Pliensbachian (Boulila et al, 2014; Boulila & Hinnov, 2017), without evidence for hiatuses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations