Les Turcs expatriés en 2005-2006 : combien sont-ils ? Où sont-ils ?

Tapia, Stéphane de

doi:10.4000/remi.3421

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Turkey is one of the main exporters of labour, which encourages its citizens to migrate and make productive investments in host countries (Rigoni, 2005). In research conducted on Turkish migration to Europe, including France, this migration, which started between 1957 and 1961, is often referred to as one characterized by demographic massiveness (De Tapia, 2006).…”

Section: Iranian Migration: a Middle-class Migrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two issues are of special significance in the comparison between Turkish and Iranian migrant populations. Firstly, Turkish migration is organized and advocated by the government in Turkey in the form of creating migration networks, such as forming air transport lines between Turkey and the receiving country (Gokalp, 1994; De Tapia, 2006; Ertul and Şenkon, 2009). In contrast, not only is Iranian migration not supported by the government, it can be described as a sort of protest migration against the incongruity between economic, political, cultural, and social infrastructures and the country's rich national resources as well as the incongruity between the infrastructures and public demands.…”

Section: Iranian Migration: a Middle‐class Migrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Divergent Heterogeneities in Iranian Migration in France: Semantic and Theoretical Limitations of Diaspora

Etemadifard

Khazaei

2020

International Migration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite its widespread use as an equivalent for migrant populations, the term diaspora remains semantically and theoretically ambiguous. This study hypothesizes that the term diaspora fails to represent Iranian migration and its divergent heterogeneities. Discussing theoretical approaches to the diaspora, the characteristics of Iranian migration, and the findings of interviews with forty young Iranian migrants living in France, the present study attempts to offer a more suitable alternative to the term diaspora. It will be revealed that the heterogeneity of Iranian migration in causes, the conception of migration experience, as well as disinclination to create a unified community in host countries, lead Iranians living outside their country to form scattered clusters. The term proposed to be used in lieu of diaspora is archipelago ethnicity, which shows both the heterogeneity and divergence in Iranian migration in general and represents the only connection between the scattered and isolated islands, that is Iranian-ness.

show abstract

Section: Iranian Migration: a Middle-class Migrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Iranian Migration: a Middle‐class Migrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Divergent Heterogeneities in Iranian Migration in France: Semantic and Theoretical Limitations of Diaspora

Etemadifard

Khazaei

2020

International Migration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Union Formation and Partner Choice in a Transnational Context: The Case of Descendants of Turkish Immigrants in France

Milewski

Hamel

2010

International Migration Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the transition to a first union of descendants of Turkish immigrants in France. We use data from the project The Integration of the European Second Generation, 2007, and apply event‐history techniques. We find that descendants of Turkish immigrants who grew up in France enter a first union earlier and more often in a direct marriage than do young adults without an immigrant background. We then describe the type of union in more detail and estimate the likelihood of a transnational partner choice, that is, between a young adult born in France of Turkish immigrant parentage and an immigrant from Turkey. We pay attention to social factors such as education, city of residence, and to cultural factors such as the rules of affinity in Turkey and the attachment to the norm of virginity at marriage as factors that orient partner choice. Finally, we discuss what anthropological methods could contribute to this research.

show abstract

Educational Mobility of Second-generation Turks

Schnell¹

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Acknowledgements 1 The Educational Mobility of the European Second Generation A Three-Country Comparison 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Ethnic educational inequalities: A theoretical framework 1.3 Research questions and design 1.4 Structure of the book 2 The Worlds of Turkish Fathers and Mothers 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Periods of Turkish immigration to Austria, France and Sweden 2.3 Policy responses by the three receiving countries 2.3.1 Austria 2.3.2 France 2.3.3 Sweden 2.4 Turkish immigrants in five urban destinations 2.5 Comparing the relative positions of the parental generation across five cities 2.6 Conclusion 3 An Initial Look at Education Outcomes 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Education levels reached by young adults in Austria, France and Sweden 3.3 Accounting for compositional differences 3.4 Inter-generational educational mobility 3.5 Conclusion 4 Behind the Scenes: The Family Examined 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Parental involvement as social capital 4.3 Older siblings' involvement as social capital 4.4 Do Turkish families muster more family support for education? 4.5 Conclusion 5 Beyond the Family: Peers and Teachers 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Social relationships with peers and teachers 5.3 Peer group characteristics of the Turkish second generation 5.4 Student-teacher relationships among the Turkish second generation 5.5 Peers and teachers as mediating actors in processes of educational attainment 5.6 Differences between the comparison group and secondgeneration Turks 5.7 Conclusion 6 Navigating the System 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Education pathways compared-the perspective on institutional arrangements 6.2.1 France 6.2.2 Sweden 6.2.3 Austria 6.3 Conclusion 7 Interactions between Individual-level and Institutional-level Factors 7.1 Introduction 7.2 What causes inequalities in education careers within systems?

show abstract

Les Turcs expatriés en 2005-2006 : combien sont-ils ? Où sont-ils ?

Cited by 5 publications

References 9 publications

Divergent Heterogeneities in Iranian Migration in France: Semantic and Theoretical Limitations of Diaspora

Divergent Heterogeneities in Iranian Migration in France: Semantic and Theoretical Limitations of Diaspora

Union Formation and Partner Choice in a Transnational Context: The Case of Descendants of Turkish Immigrants in France

Educational Mobility of Second-generation Turks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About