IEEE Symposium on Ultrasonics, 2003
DOI: 10.1109/ultsym.2003.1293128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesion size ratio for differentiating breast masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, when the threshold of 1.2 for area ratio was applied to our own image ratio data, our group sensitivities and specificities were 94% and 29%, respectively. Our best performer (observer A) obtained a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 61% by using an area ratio threshold of 1.01, which is closer to the sensitivity and specificity values obtained by Hall et al (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, when the threshold of 1.2 for area ratio was applied to our own image ratio data, our group sensitivities and specificities were 94% and 29%, respectively. Our best performer (observer A) obtained a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 61% by using an area ratio threshold of 1.01, which is closer to the sensitivity and specificity values obtained by Hall et al (22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, a comparison was made between the results presented by Hall et al (22) and those obtained in the current study by using the same US strain imaging algorithm and analysis approach. A P value of less than .05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference for all analyses.…”
Section: Data and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is certainly true of tumors found in the breast and the prostate. Motivated by this observation several clinical trials have been conducted (some are on-going) with the aim of assessing the utility of elasticity imaging in the detection and diagnosis of breast and prostate cancer (Garra et al 1997, Hiltawsky et al 2001, Hall et al 2003, Itoh et al 2006, Regner et al 2006, Burnside et al 2007). Most of these, as indeed most elasticity imaging studies to date, have focused on the linear elastic properties of tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That frame rate provides sufficient feedback to the eye-brain system to control the boundary conditions of the deformation to always obtain high-quality elasticity imaging data with freehand scanning. The preliminary results of clinical trials in breast imaging with this system [5,6], which currently include over 300 subjects, suggest that elasticity imaging provides diagnostically-useful information that is not otherwise available. Specifically, the ratio of the lesion size in a strain image to the lesion size in the corresponding Bmode image is a sensitive criterion for differentiating benign from malignant lesions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%