2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesions of the nucleus accumbens disrupt reinforcement omission effects in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NAc activity also encodes information about reward (26, 39-41), and is critical for appropriate responses to reward omissions (42, 43). Here, reward omission differentially elicited excitatory phasic responses, proportions of which were modulated by NAc region and risk preference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAc activity also encodes information about reward (26, 39-41), and is critical for appropriate responses to reward omissions (42, 43). Here, reward omission differentially elicited excitatory phasic responses, proportions of which were modulated by NAc region and risk preference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NAcc and the medial caudate nucleus robustly activate during reward anticipation (Deadwyler et al, 2004), while the rostroventral putamen most reliably deactivates in response to non-reward delivery (McClure et al, 2003; O'Doherty et al, 2003). Lesions of NAcc have recently been shown to disrupt reinforcement-omission effects (Judice-Daher and Bueno, 2013). However, no cellular recordings have yet shown that NAcc cells react specifically to reward omission.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the response rates during LH showed an opposite distribution. These data characterize the pattern of behavior in FI LH signaled schedules (7,8,10,9,23,24) and can be explained by evoked expectations and the delivery of reinforcement (15,25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…KA was infused with a 5 µL Hamilton syringe over a 2-min period according to the following coordinates: SNc (n=27): –4.3 mm posterior to bregma and 2.2 mm from the midline, with infusions to a depth of 7.4 mm from the skull surface (0.25 µL per site) (19). The Sham-SNc (n=16) groups received the same surgical treatment, with the exception that no solution was infused (7,8,10,11,20,21). After surgery, all rats received a single subcutaneous injection of 0.1 mL per 100 g body mass (2.15 mg/mL) of Flunixin Meglumine (Banamine®, 50 mg/mL, Intervet, Brazil) for pain relief and were allowed to recover from the surgery for 5–7 days before behavioral testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%