2019
DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1675126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less gap imbalance with restricted kinematic alignment than with mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: simulations on 3-D bone models created from CT-scans

Abstract: Background and purpose — Mechanical alignment techniques for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) introduce significant anatomic alteration and secondary ligament imbalances. We propose a restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) protocol to minimize these issues and improve TKA clinical outcomes.Patients and methods — rKA tibial and femoral bone resections were simulated on 1,000 knee CT scans from a database of patients undergoing TKA. rKA was defined by the following criteria: independent tibial and femoral cuts within… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulating MA bone cuts on 1,000 knee CT scans, we found that MA results in many cases of gap asymmetries ( 8 , 9 ). Mediolateral imbalances of more than 3 mm were observed in 25 and 54% of varus and valgus knees, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulating MA bone cuts on 1,000 knee CT scans, we found that MA results in many cases of gap asymmetries ( 8 , 9 ). Mediolateral imbalances of more than 3 mm were observed in 25 and 54% of varus and valgus knees, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Simulating MA bone cuts on 1,000 knee CT scans, we found that MA results in many cases of gap asymmetries (8,9). Mediolateral imbalances of more than 3 mm were observed in FIGURE 1 | Anatomic modification linked to mechanical alignment technique on the distal femur and proximal tibia.…”
Section: Introduction Mechanical Alignment Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In extension, there were significantly fewer cases having an imbalance ≥ 3 mm with restricted KA (8.3%) versus MA (33%), and ≥ 5 mm with restricted KA (1.5%) versus MA (11%). With restricted KA, the percentage of knees with space imbalances inferior to 3 mm in both flexion and extension was 92% versus 63% with MA with posterior condylar reference and 49% with MA with trans epicondylar reference [ 37 ].…”
Section: Restricted Kinematic Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is a lack of a clear definition of when (or how often) adjustments are needed, and for what patients or phenotypes. Furthermore, there are only very limited data on the consequences for the patient-in terms of alignment, stability, and outcome [8,9]. Additional to this, there now is the need for technological support of some sort to be able to (1) identify a situation that needs to be adapted, and (2) precisely transfer this plan to the patient [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%