2010
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.165704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Less invasive autopsy: an evidenced based approach

Abstract: Despite the initial promises, less invasive autopsy by postmortem MRI has not gained widespread acceptance and is not yet used as a clinical tool. Current evidence on postmortem MRI is primarily limited to examination of fetal brain malformations. Large prospective studies funded by the UK Department of Health evaluating accuracy of postmortem MRI are now nearing completion. Less invasive autopsies may have a major effect in resurrecting autopsy rates; however, an evidence based and systematic approach towards… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Chief Medical Officer (UK) recommended rigorous evaluation of post mortem MR imaging as an alternative for autopsy, before it is widely introduced into the UK clinical practice. Following this, the UK Department of Health funded the present study (MaRIAS-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) for systematic and rigorous evaluation of post mortem MR imaging as an alternative for conventional autopsy with a view to making recommendations to the Department of Health with regard to the advisability of introduction into routine clinical practice, either on its own or along with other minimally invasive post mortem investigations [37]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chief Medical Officer (UK) recommended rigorous evaluation of post mortem MR imaging as an alternative for autopsy, before it is widely introduced into the UK clinical practice. Following this, the UK Department of Health funded the present study (MaRIAS-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) for systematic and rigorous evaluation of post mortem MR imaging as an alternative for conventional autopsy with a view to making recommendations to the Department of Health with regard to the advisability of introduction into routine clinical practice, either on its own or along with other minimally invasive post mortem investigations [37]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,24 In summary, we have demonstrated both significant differences and similarities in autopsy cases of infants examined at one centre over the past 100 years, where the postmortem examination itself, which besides the use of ancillary investigations, remains essentially the same. 25 Recent advances however, include development of the less-invasive autopsy, using MRI, 26,27 the minimally invasive autopsy, using laparoscopy and the molecular autopsy. 28 In another 100 years, we hope that there will not only be changes in mortality patterns but also improvements in the identification of currently 'unknown' causes of death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ex vivo technologies have the potential to not only support autopsies that otherwise would be performed manually (Thayyil et al , 2013), but investigations that make use of such technologies have the potential to identify abnormal trajectories of brain growth that may be associated with extremely early stage development of neurological disorders, such as autism. However, there are many challenges to overcome when making such pattern recognition technologies widely available and useful, including the need for reliable data analysis techniques that can handle the large-scale deformation differences observed in ex vivo specimens relative to that observed in vivo , contrast differences (Augustinack et al , 2014), challenges associated with ex vivo ventricular bleeds without dilation (Thayyil 2011; Thayyil et al 2013) and more.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%