2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2142-4
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessening the adverse effect of the semivariogram model selection on an interpolative survey using kriging technique

Abstract: Objective Many parameters in environmental, scientific and human sciences investigations need to be interpolated. Geostatistics, with its structural analysis step, is widely used for this purpose. This precious step that evaluates data correlation and dependency is performed thanks to semivariogram. However, an incorrect choice of a semivariogram model can skew all the prediction results. The main objectives of this paper are (1) to simply illustrate the influence of the choice of an inappropriate semivariogra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kriging was used in this study since the data is normally distributed and stationary. Furthermore, Kriging is the most excellent interpolation method since it is unbiased, it performs better, and had the smallest error values (Zimmerman et al, 1999;Schwendel et al, 2012;Arun, 2013;Arétouyap et al, 2016;Mutaqin et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging was used in this study since the data is normally distributed and stationary. Furthermore, Kriging is the most excellent interpolation method since it is unbiased, it performs better, and had the smallest error values (Zimmerman et al, 1999;Schwendel et al, 2012;Arun, 2013;Arétouyap et al, 2016;Mutaqin et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the spatial variation of heavy metals, present in sediments around the Nun River, five semivariogram models (stable, spherical, circular, exponential and K-Bessel) were fitted for each of the four critical parameters (heavy metals) used for geospatial analysis. To choose the model that best described each of the four critical parameters, four goodness-of-fit statistics expressed in equations ( 1) -(4) [18], namely, mean square error (MSE), root mean square error (RMSE), root mean square standardized error (RMSSE) and average standard error (ASE) were utilized.…”
Section: Geospatial Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate estimation, the MSE, RMSE and ASE indices should be as small as possible whereas the RMSSE index should be as close to unity as possible. If RMSSE is greater (less) than 1, then the variability of the estimations is underestimated (overestimated) [18]. The choice of considered indices was based on their ability to adequately evaluate the fitted distribution and determine the goodness-of-fit between observed and estimated parameters.…”
Section: Geospatial Analysis Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a spherical semivariogram resulted in the lowest mean error, average standard error, and root mean square error when compared to pentaspherical and exponential semivariograms. We followed the procedures outlined in [84,85] for semivariogram selection. One kriged map was created for each year.…”
Section: The Neural Network Approach and Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%