2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2012.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesser incidence of accidental catheter removal with femoral versus radial arterial access

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accidental catheter removal (ACR) rates are reported to be approximately 4%-7%. 4,5 On the other hand, restricting wrist movement with a splint increases potential risks of developing medical device-related peptic ulcer (MDRPU) or ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) that results in neuromuscular dysfunction in these critically ill patients. 6 Therefore, a new insertion site that does not hinder rehabilitation and with less complications is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accidental catheter removal (ACR) rates are reported to be approximately 4%-7%. 4,5 On the other hand, restricting wrist movement with a splint increases potential risks of developing medical device-related peptic ulcer (MDRPU) or ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) that results in neuromuscular dysfunction in these critically ill patients. 6 Therefore, a new insertion site that does not hinder rehabilitation and with less complications is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the potentially life threatening complications associated with accidental removal and the risks involved with reinsertion, it is somewhat surprising that data related to incidence and risk factors, particularly in an Australasian setting, are limited [2][3][4][5] . Only two studies have been conducted in the last decade and in this period there has been, at least anecdotally, a move away from the securing of catheters with sutures [6][7][8] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%