2010
DOI: 10.1177/016146811011201315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lesson Study as a Human Science

Abstract: Neither experimental nor design research in education is as well developed in Japan as in the United States (Inagaki, 1995; Nihon Kyouiku Houhougakkai, 2009). Yet Japanese educational practice employs a type of educational research called "lesson study" that is credited for instructional improvements, including the shift from "teaching as telling" to "teaching for understanding" in science (Lewis & Tsuchida, 1997) and the development of structured problem-solving lessons in mathematics (Takahashi, Watanabe, Y… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They explicitly connect their work to the metaphor of organizing for learning, asking "how it is that actors collectively organize local activity for and with one another by drawing on available resources, and with the meaning of current activity depending on continual acts of reorganizing." Two other chapters (Herrenkohl, DeWater &Kawasaki, 2010, andLewis, Akita, &Sato, 2010) explore how collaborations between teachers and researchers and among teachers are locally organized to support improvements in teaching and learning.…”
Section: Revisiting the Qualitative-quantitative Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They explicitly connect their work to the metaphor of organizing for learning, asking "how it is that actors collectively organize local activity for and with one another by drawing on available resources, and with the meaning of current activity depending on continual acts of reorganizing." Two other chapters (Herrenkohl, DeWater &Kawasaki, 2010, andLewis, Akita, &Sato, 2010) explore how collaborations between teachers and researchers and among teachers are locally organized to support improvements in teaching and learning.…”
Section: Revisiting the Qualitative-quantitative Dividementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chapters by Mørck (2010), Ares (2010), Kirshner (2010), and de Castell and Jenson (2010) all call for more participatory forms of inquiry and action to help people on the margins to imagine and move in directions toward social futures of their own choosing. Likewise, in their chapters, Herrenkohl, DeWater, and Kawasaki (2010) and Lewis, Akita, and Sato (2010) call for more opportunities for teacher agency in research and the reform of schools. Similar calls for broader participation in initiatives to shape learning opportunities and life trajectories find expression in calls for more participatory design of educational innovations (Roschelle & Jackiw, 2000;Roschelle, Penuel, & Shechtman, 2006), teacher action research (Carr & Kemmis, 1983), and the small but growing literature on youth organizing for educational change (Cammarota & Fine, 2008;Oakes & Rogers, 2006).…”
Section: The Focus On Identity and Bets On Persons' Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondary strategies develop teachers to 4.1) combine knowledge and experiences. 4 Glatthorn (1984) จุ ไรรั ตน์ สุ ดรุ ่ ง (2559) Tietze (2013) Joyce andShowers (1995, 1996 อ้ างถึ งใน วั ชรา เล่ าเรี ยนดี , 2556) Sally ( 1956) Lewis (2002) 2556) Glatthorn (1984) จุ ไรรั ตน์ สุ ดรุ ่ ง (2559) Tietze (2013) Joyce andShowers (1995, 1996) อ้ างถึ งใน วั ชราเล่ าเรี ยนดี (2556) Sally ( 1956) Lewis (2002) การสะท้ อนความคิ ด ของตนเอง…”
unclassified