2018
DOI: 10.22605/rrh4596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons for health program monitoring and evaluation in a low resource setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the development of the tool, successes and challenges of working with an international organisation in a low-resource setting arose. A strength of this project was the development of a medical assessment tool that was built as a response to a programme logic model, with the main outcomes focused on activities and outputs directed towards individualised, therapeutic care in all aspects of the programme (Field et al, 2018). Moreover, The Plaster House staff was directly involved in the tool development, as feedback on the plausibility of the tool was critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the development of the tool, successes and challenges of working with an international organisation in a low-resource setting arose. A strength of this project was the development of a medical assessment tool that was built as a response to a programme logic model, with the main outcomes focused on activities and outputs directed towards individualised, therapeutic care in all aspects of the programme (Field et al, 2018). Moreover, The Plaster House staff was directly involved in the tool development, as feedback on the plausibility of the tool was critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not Vol. 33, No.2, 2022; doi 10.47985/dcidj.586 possible to evaluate data from programme activities already occurring at The Plaster House (Field et al, 2018), as minimal data was being collected. Therefore, in developing the medical assessment tool, the evaluation team worked together to identify one disease-specific indicator to support the general developmental progress indicators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Governments play a major role in achieving better quality with value in health care and in the success or failure of healthcare reform and improvement [26]. While regulation is formulated at the national level, implementation occurs mostly at the regional and district levels [27], thus monitoring and evaluation at every system level is needed to check whether the program or action is implemented as planned and has achieved the anticipated results [28]. This is essential to determine whether the program should be continued, modified or eliminated [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is essential to determine whether the program should be continued, modified or eliminated [29]. Monitoring and evaluation are complementary activities and need to be integrated with implementation, not as a distinct activity [20,28] and need to have clear key performance indicators. Within a local government context, carrying out monitoring and evaluation also demonstrates good governance and accountability [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%