2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.inhe.2009.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lessons from community participation in health programmes: a review of the post Alma-Ata experience

Abstract: The year 2008 marked the 30 year anniversary of Primary Health Care, the health policy of all member nations of the WHO. Community participation was one of the key principles of this policy. This article reviews the experiences of and lessons learned by policy makers, planners and programme managers in attempting to integrate community participation into their health programmes. The lessons, identified in an earlier article by the author, are still relevant today. They help to identify three reasons why integr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
174
0
8

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
174
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…[21] Mobilisation of impoverished rural communities to participate in improving health reflects the underlying value for social justice, and promotes their contribution to decisions that affect them. [22] c) Community Health Promotion to prevent malaria It involves environmental modification and proper water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices to control disease-causing agents such as mosquitoes and it is pivotal in breaking the infection cycle. [15] Community-based health promotion emphasises integrated and comprehensive primary prevention, through direct education and involvement of the general population in specific activities [20] such as environmental management and proper WASH. A synergistic implementation of these interventions is likely to improve knowledge, attitude and practice, and yield positive changes at the individual, household and community levels, with long term health benefits.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Prevalence Of Malaria In Cameroonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21] Mobilisation of impoverished rural communities to participate in improving health reflects the underlying value for social justice, and promotes their contribution to decisions that affect them. [22] c) Community Health Promotion to prevent malaria It involves environmental modification and proper water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices to control disease-causing agents such as mosquitoes and it is pivotal in breaking the infection cycle. [15] Community-based health promotion emphasises integrated and comprehensive primary prevention, through direct education and involvement of the general population in specific activities [20] such as environmental management and proper WASH. A synergistic implementation of these interventions is likely to improve knowledge, attitude and practice, and yield positive changes at the individual, household and community levels, with long term health benefits.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Prevalence Of Malaria In Cameroonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, community participation has been extensively conceptualised and analysed in the broader literature on health (Morgan, 2001;Rifkin, 1986Rifkin, , 2009Zakus & Lysack, 1998). Rifkin (1986), points to three main approaches to community participation in health programmes: medical; health services; and community development.…”
Section: Community Participation In Cbhimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also reveal constraints, specifically in terms of representativeness, since participation schemes fail to take into account the social diversity of communities, especially excluded groups, (Frankish et al, 2002;Tritter and McCallum, 2006); the potential for influence and the power imbalance between the sponsors of the deliberative process and the participants (Serapioni and Duxbury, 2012) and the lack of any assessment focussing on the effectiveness of participation in healthcare issues (Rowe and Frewer, 2004;Lehoux et al, 2009). There is also a serious risk of idealising such practices, likening them to magic formulas for solving the problems of the health system (Zakus and Lysack, 1998;Rifkin, 2009) and a resistance on the part of healthcare professionals and managers to implementing the outcomes of public participation in healthcare deliberative processes (Martin, 2008). With regard to the latter point, citizen involvement is more widely used as a "technology of legitimation" (Harrison and Mort, 1998).…”
Section: Civil Society's Involvement In Healthcare Systems: Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%